What is the role and value of facilitation within sessions of Case-based Learning (CBL) in undergraduate medicine: Protocol for a scoping review of the literature
Berg, C.; Hammond, L.; Howard, B.; Diug, B.; Sorinola, O.
Show abstract
BackgroundCBL involves students working within groups to solve clinical and non-clinical cases which enables the development of communication and team-working skills and promotes a deeper understanding of relevant clinical knowledge. CBL sessions are traditionally supported by an in-person facilitator in face to face settings. The recent COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated moves to online learning in many areas, one of which is CBL, providing good reason to consider the role of the facilitator in CBL and digital opportunities to augment facilitation. AimsTo understand the role of facilitation within CBL teaching (in face to face and online settings) and the impact that different approaches to facilitation can have on outcomes including student experience and engagement. MethodsA scoping review will be conducted of four main academic and medical databases: MedLine, Scopus, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE) and Education Research Complete (ERC) using a search strategy built around Undergraduate medical students (Population), Approaches to facilitation (Concept) and Case-based learning (Context). Articles will be selected according to pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria, with scope for the selection criteria to further develop. Charting from included full text articles will encompass research approach, approach to facilitation and findings about facilitation. A constructivist conceptual framework will be used to guide the synthesis. ConclusionsOverall, it is hoped that this review will be able to inform the role of facilitation within CBL sessions and the potential impact that this has on attainment, engagement and satisfaction of students, as well as their development of skills such as: teamworking, communication and problem solving.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 95%
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 95%
- Team-Based Learning Versus Lecture-Based Instruction for Chest Radiograph Interpretation in Physician Associate Education: A Quasi-Experimental Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Introducing the 4Ps Model of Transitioning to Distance Learning: a convergent mixed methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic 96%
- A national professional development program fills mentoring gaps for postdoctoral researchers 95%
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Redeployment and training of healthcare professionals to Intensive Care during COVID-19: a systemic review 94%
- Evaluating a first fully automated interview grounded in Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) methodology: results from a feasibility study 93%
- Conceptualizing centers of excellence: A global evidence 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Addressing cultural and knowledge barriers to enable preclinical sex inclusive research 91%
- Development and Assessment of a Sustainable PhD Internship Program Supporting Diverse Biomedical Career Outcomes 90%
- Co-reviewing and ghostwriting by early career researchers in the peer review of manuscripts 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Self-Directed Learning Activities at King Abdulaziz University: A Qualitative Study of Faculty Perceptions 96%
- Navigating the Crisis: A Cross-sectional Survey Analysis of Resident Doctors' Experiences of Specialty Training and Employment in Today's NHS 90%
- Impact of mHealth interventions on antenatal and postnatal care utilization in low and middle-income countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.