Back

Gravity effects are better optimized by older than young adults when reaching with the non-dominant arm

Poirier, G.; Papaxanthis, C.; Juranville, A.; Lebigre, M.; Mourey, F.; Gaveau, J.

2021-10-28 neuroscience
10.1101/2021.10.26.465988 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Motor lateralization refers to differences in the neural organization of cerebral hemispheres, resulting in different control specializations between the dominant and the non-dominant motor systems. Multiple studies proposed that the dominant hemisphere is specialized for open-loop optimization-like processes. Recently, comparing arm kinematics between upward and downward movements, we found that the dominant arm outperformed the non-dominant one regarding gravity-related motor optimization in healthy young participants. The literature about aging effects on motor control presents several neurophysiological and behavioral evidences for an age-related reduction of motor lateralization. Here, we compare the lateralization of a well-known gravity-related optimal motor control process between young and older adults. Forty-one healthy young (mean age = 24.3 {+/-} 3 years) and forty-two healthy older adults (mean age = 72.0 {+/-} 6 years) performed single degree-of-freedom vertical arm movements between two targets (upward and downward). Participants alternatively reached with their dominant and non-dominant arms. We recorded arm kinematics and electromyographic activities of the prime movers (Anterior and Posterior Deltoids) and we analyzed parameters thought to represent the hallmark of the gravity-related optimization process (i.e directional asymmetries and negative epochs on the phasic EMG activity). We found strong age x arm interaction effects on all parameters; i.e., relative durations to peak acceleration and peak velocity and the negativity of antigravity muscles phasic signals. Although all three parameters showed a lateralization effect where the dominant arm was superior to the non-dominant arm in young adults (as in Poirier et al. 2022), we found no such effect in older adults. With both arms, the results of older adults lied between those of the dominant and non-dominant arm of young adults. These results add to those of recent literature showing that feedforward motor control remains functional in older adults. More, the results obtained with the non-dominant arm may support a previously hypothesized increased reliance on predictive mechanisms in older adults.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
40.1%
2
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.5%
3
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
7
npj Aging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
8
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
9
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
10
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
11
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
13
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
14
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
15
Brain Structure and Function
83 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
16
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
19
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
22
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.7%
24
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.5%
26
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
27
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
28
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%