The Open Field test as a tool for behavior analysis in pigs - is a standardization of setup necessary? A systematic review.
Schulz, M.; Kopaczka, M.; Tolba, R.; Zieglowski, L.
Show abstract
The Open Field test is a common tool to measure anxiety and behavioral changes in rodents. However, scientific findings of rodent experiments may not translate adequately to humans and it has been shown that larger animal models might perform better in that regard. As a result, the number of published studies involving the Open Field test in domestic pig models is increasing. The aim of our review was to investigate the Open Field set-ups in published studies as well as similarity between performance and parameters published. Following the PRISMA guidelines for reviews we selected 69 studies for data extraction in this systematic review. We were able to determine specific set-up conditions such as size, duration and daytime for most of the included studies and found a high variability within these test specifiers. Results indicate a non-uniform performance of set-up including size, timing, parameters and additional combined tests such as the novel object test. We would like to point out the need for standardization of Open Field test for pigs in order to improve result, comparability and reduce inconsistencies.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Practical considerations in the use of a porcine model (Sus scrofa domesticus) to assess prevention of postoperative peritubal adhesions 94%
- Human emotional odours influence horses' behaviour and physiology 93%
- Maternal and/or direct supplementation with a combination of a casein hydrolysate and yeast β-glucan on post-weaning performance and intestinal health in the pig 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Revealing the hidden social structure of pigs with AI assisted automated monitoring data and social network analysis 92%
- Welfare at group and individual level: optical flow patterns of broiler chicken flocks are correlated with the behaviour of individual birds 91%
- Researchers and their experimental models: A pilot survey. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- AI for IACUC: Accurate Initial Assessment of Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee Protocols 88%
- GrimACE: Automated, multimodal cage-side assessment of pain and well-being in mice 88%
- Characterization of A Bronchoscopically Induced Transgenic Lung Cancer Pig Model for Human Translatability 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Phenotypic link between protein efficiency and pig welfare suggests no apparent trade-offs for mitigating nitrogen pollution 94%
- An approach to stress assessment during hunting: Cortisol levels of wild boar (Sus scrofa) during drive hunts 92%
- Multimodal characterization of Yucatan minipig behavior and physiology through maturation 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.