Back

The effect of pre-analytical and physiological variables on cell-free DNA fragmentation.

van der Pol, Y.; Moldovan, N.; Verkuijlen, S.; Ramaker, J.; Boers, D.; Onstenk, W.; de Rooij, J.; Bahce, I.; Pegtel, D. M.; Mouliere, F.

2021-09-18 genomics
10.1101/2021.09.17.460828 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Assays that account for the biological properties and fragmentation of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) can improve the performance of liquid biopsy. However, pre-analytic and physiological differences between individuals on fragmentomic analysis are poorly defined. We analyzed the impact of collection tube, plasma processing time and physiology on the size distribution of cfDNA, their genome-wide representation and sequence diversity at the cfDNA fragment-ends using shallow Whole Genome Sequencing. We observed that using different stabilizing collection tubes, or processing times does not affect the cfDNA fragment sizes, but can impact the genome-wide fragmentation patterns and fragment-end sequences of cfDNA. In addition, beyond differences depending on the gender, the physiological conditions tested between 63 individuals (age, body mass index, use of medication and chronic conditions) minimally influenced the outcome of fragmentomic methods. Our results highlight that fragmentomic approaches have potential for implementation in the clinic, pending clear traceability of analytical and physiological factors.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
4
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.2%
6
Forensic Science International: Genetics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
7
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
9
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
10
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
11
Transfusion
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
13
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.1%
15
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
Oncotarget
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
17
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
19
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
20
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
23
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
27
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%