Back

XePhIR: The zebrafish Xenograft Phenotype Interactive Repository

Groenewoud, A.; Forn-Cuni, G.; Engel, F.; Snaar-Jagalska, E. B. E.

2021-09-15 cancer biology
10.1101/2021.09.13.460043 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Zebrafish xenografts are an established model in cancer biology, with a steadily rising number of models and users. However, as of yet, there is no platform dedicated to standardizing protocols and sharing data regarding zebrafish xenograft phenotypes. Here, we present the Xenograft Phenotype Interactive Repository (XePhIR, www.xephir.org) as an independent data sharing platform to deposit, share and repurpose zebrafish xenograft data. Deposition of data and publication with XePhIR will be done after the acceptation of the original publication. This will enhance the reach of the original research article, enhance visibility, and does not interfere with publication or copyrights of the original article. With XePhIR, we strive to fulfill these objectives and reason that this resource will enhance reproducibility and showcase the appeal and applicability of the zebrafish xenograft model.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Protocols
○ 33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.3%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Scientific Data
○ 209 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
Similar papers in this journal
3
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 26%
5.6%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Biology Open
● 156 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.6%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 17%
5.2%
Similar papers in this journal
6
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
● 22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
7
Journal of Visualized Experiments
● 34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
8
F1000Research
○ 88 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Database
◐ 61 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
10
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.8%
11
Disease Models & Mechanisms
139 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.5%
12
Neoplasia
○ 23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
13
GigaScience
◐ 212 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
15
Cells
○ 249 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Oncology
○ 103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
PeerJ
◐ 308 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
18
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
○ 98 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
19
Cell Reports Methods
○ 165 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Lab Animal
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
21
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
◐ 351 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
22
Cancers
○ 213 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
23
BMC Biology
○ 265 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
24
Bioinformatics Advances
◐ 203 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Biology Methods and Protocols
◐ 61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
Heliyon
○ 152 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
27
Life Science Alliance
● 285 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
28
Briefings in Bioinformatics
◐ 354 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
29
PROTEOMICS
○ 43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
30
International Journal of Cancer
○ 49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.