Back

Training and Development Needs Assessment in a large NIHR Biomedical Research Centre: A Survey

Bell, K.; Shah, S. G. S.; Henderson, L. R.; Kiparoglou, V.

2021-08-29 medical education
10.1101/2021.08.27.21261708 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo assess the training and development needs of researchers and support staff affiliated to the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), one of the largest BRCs in England, and to find out about their past experiences of training. DesignA cross-sectional online questionnaire survey. Setting and ParticipantsA convenience sample of clinicians, nurses, midwives, allied health professionals, researchers and support staff (N=798) affiliated with the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre. Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe primary outcome measure was the type of training and the secondary outcome measures were the duration, location and timing of training. ResultsThe response rate was 24%. Of 189 respondents, 114 were women (60%) and 75 men (40%). Respondents included research scientists (31%), medical doctors and dentists (17%), nurses and midwives (16%) and research managers and administrators (16%). Seventy-one percent respondents (n=134) reported attending at least one training activity in the last year and the most wanted training was leadership skills (25%), followed by research grant and fellowship writing (18%) and statistical analysis (16%). An ideal length of a training course was half a day (41%), whole day (25%) and 1-2 hours (22%). The most preferred time of the day for training was morning (60%) and afternoon (22%) and the favoured delivery style of training was an interactive workshop (52%), lecture/talk (25%), online (9%) and practical activities (9%). The main barriers to attending training courses were the lack of time (n-18%), work commitments (13%), and childcare responsibilities (6%). ConclusionsTranslational researchers and supporting affiliates want short, easily accessible, interactive training sessions, particularly leadership training skills and grant and fellowship writing. However, practical elements are important too e.g. in a convenient location during the working day. Work commitment is the biggest obstacle in doing training. Strengths and limitations of this studyO_LIThis survey was done to develop and revamp the NIHR Oxford BRCs training programme that met the training and development needs of our researchers and research support staff. C_LIO_LILeadership skills, research grant and fellowship writing, statistical analysis were the most wanted training. C_LIO_LIThe lack of time, work commitments, and childcare responsibilities were the main barriers to attending training courses. C_LIO_LIOur findings have limited generalisability because the study is based on the responses of participants who are affiliated with only one NIHR BRC; hence, these findings could not be generalised to other NIHR BRCs. C_LIO_LIThese findings might inform the training and development programmes in other NIHR BRCs in the country. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.