Back

Using herbarium samples for NGS methods - a methodological comparison

Marincek, P.; Wagner, N. D.; Tomasello, S.

2021-08-26 plant biology
10.1101/2021.08.26.457828 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Herbaria harbor a tremendous amount of plant specimens that are rarely used for plant systematic studies. The main reason is the difficulty to extract a decent quantity of good quality DNA from the preserved plant material. While the extraction of ancient DNA in animals is well established, studies including old plant material are still underrepresented. In our study we compared the standard Qiagen DNeasy Plant Mini Kit and a specific PTB-DTT protocol on two different plant genera (Xanthium L. and Salix L.). The included herbarium material covered about two centuries of plant collections. A selected subset of samples was used for a standard library preparation as well as a target enrichment approach. The results revealed that PTB-PTT resulted in higher quantity and quality regarding DNA yield. For relatively recent herbarium specimens, and despite the lower overall yield of DNA, the Qiagen Kit resulted in better sequencing results regarding the number of filtered and mapped reads. We were able to successfully sequence a sample from 1820 and conclude that it is possible to include old herbarium specimens in NGS approaches. This opens a treasure box for phylogenomic research.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.6%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
22.6%
3
BioTechniques
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
5
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
6
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
7
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
8
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
9
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
10
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
11
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
12
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
13
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
14
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
15
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
16
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
17
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
Life
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
19
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.7%
23
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
Journal of Computational Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Molecular Biology Reports
19 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
27
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.6%
28
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
29
Database
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%