Instruments to assess Evidence-Based Practice among healthcare professionals: a systematic review
Martins da Silva, A.; Valentim, D. P.; Martins, A. L.; Padula, R. S.
Show abstract
The study makes it possible to select the most appropriate instruments to evaluate the use of Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) among health professionals. The objective of this study was to assess the measurement properties, summarize and describe the instruments that evaluate the use of EBP in health professionals, currently available through the update of the systematic review. The study was conducted and reported according to recommendations of the PRISMA checklist. A systematic search was conducted in the databases: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and ERIC. In addition, three groups of search terms: EBP terms; evaluation; cross-cultural adaptation and measurement proprieties. They included studies that showed assessment tools of EBP in healthcare workers in general publication of full-text scientific articles, which tested the measurement properties and publication of an article in English. Searches included published studies from 2006 until July 2020. Evaluation of the methodological quality of the studies was conducted according to the COSMIN initiative. 92 studies were included. Forty new instruments have been identified to assess EBP. From these, most were developed for nursing professionals and physiotherapists. More than 48% of studies have American and Australian English as their native language. Only 28% of the studies included students in the samples. Reliability was considered appropriate (sufficient) in 76% of the instruments. The COSMIN checklist classified 7 (seven) instruments as being suitable for use in the target audience. However, Fresno Test remains the most appropriate instrument for assessing the use of EBP in healthcare professionals. 40 new instruments that assess EBP have been identified. Most are consistent and reliable for measuring the use of EBP in healthcare professionals. The Fresno Test, in a list of seven reliable and valid instruments for analysis, remains the most used and the one that most assesses the domains of EBP.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Process of Use of Evidence Products by Frontline Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Staff at the Facility Level in Ghana. 95%
- Self-Rehabilitation Strategy for Rural Community-dwelling Stroke Survivors in a Lower-Middle Income Country: A Delphi Study 95%
- REPLICCAR II Study: Data Quality Audit in the Paulista Cardiovascular Surgery Registry 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 96%
- Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions in health organisations after patient safety incidents: a protocol for a scoping review 96%
- Administration approaches of nursing assistants in hospitals: a scoping review 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A cross-sectional audit and survey of Open Science and Data Sharing practices at The Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital 93%
- Taxonomy of interventions at academic institutions to improve research quality 92%
- Findings of a feasibility study of pre-operative pulmonary rehabilitation to reduce post-operative pulmonary complications in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease scheduled for major abdominal surgery. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A cross-sectional survey of material deprivation and suicide-related ideation among Vietnamese technical interns in Japan in 2021 91%
- The measurement properties and acceptability of a new parent-infant bonding tool (‘Me and My Baby’) designed for use in a universal healthcare setting in the UK 91%
- Quality of life and depressive symptoms among Peruvian university students during the COVID-19 pandemic 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 95%
- Impact of electronic medical records on healthcare delivery in Nigeria: A Review 95%
- Use of assistive technology to assess distal motor function in subjects with neuromuscular disease 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.