Back

Knowledge And Risk Perception Of Nigerians Towards The Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19)

Udomah, B. F.; Ashaolu, U. O.; Olomofe, C. O.; Dada, O. F.; Soyemi, V. K.; Aremu-Kasumu, Y. B.; Ochieze, C. J.; Adeyemi, O. A.; Owolabi, A. O.; Igbokwe, M. C.; Ajumuka, E. E.; Ologunde, K. W.; Popoola, G. O.; Ariyo, O. E.; Fayemi, O. B.

2021-08-01 infectious diseases
10.1101/2021.07.30.21261351 medRxiv
Show abstract

ABSTARCTO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSThe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is far from over, although appreciable progress has been made to limit the devastating effects of the pandemic across the globe. Adequate knowledge and risk perception is a critical assessment that is required to ensure proper preventive measures. This study assessed these among Nigerians. MethodsThe study was a cross-sectional assessment of 776 consenting Nigerian adults that were distributed across the 6 geo-political zones and the Federal Capital Territory. Online pre-tested, semi-structured questionnaire were used to obtain the socio-demographic data and assessed the knowledge and risk perception of the participants to COVID-19. The knowledge of COVID-19 was assessed based on the number of accurate responses given in comparison to average scores. Chi-square analysis was computed to analysis the association between socio-demographic characteristics and knowledge of COVID-19 and risk perception. Data analysis was done using SPSS version 21, the level of significance was set at value p<0.05 at 95% confidence interval. ResultsMajority of the participants were male 451 (58.1%), there was a good knowledge of COVID-19 among 90.3% of respondents with 57% having positive risk perception. There was a statistically significant relationship between good knowledge and positive risk perception of COVID-19 (p < 0.001). Annual income (p =0.012) and the perception that "vaccines are good" significantly predict positive risk perception of COVID-19 among the respondents. ConclusionA good knowledge of COVID-19 and vaccination against the virus were the two most important factors that determined risk perception among the population. This may be because of the widespread advocacy, and it portends a good omen at combating COVID-19 menace.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.6%
2
Pan African Medical Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.3%
3
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.0%
4
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.6%
6
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
7
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
8
Journal of Public Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
9
IJID Regions
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
10
Vaccines
198 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
Epidemiology and Infection
89 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
13
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
14
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
15
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.4%
16
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
JMIRx Med
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
21
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
22
Journal of Medical Virology
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Archives of Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
26
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
27
Public Health
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
68 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%