State-dependent patterns and coupling between the vaccination schedule, population mobility and the COVID epidemic outline, in the US states
Radulescu, A.; Alonso, T.; Reid, N.; Sanchez, J.
Show abstract
We study the evolution of the COVID-19 epidemic in the US, since January 2020 until May 2021. Our primary goal is to understand some of the complex coupled dynamics between factors that ultimately regulate the epidemic case load. As potentially crucial factors, we focus on population mobility and vaccination patters (both related to risk of contracting the SARS-Cov2 virus). These factors may in turn depend on demographic parameters (which are unrelated to the epidemic evolution), but also on the population response to the epidemic outbreak itself. In our work, we use correlation analyses, in conjunction with open source data from US states, to investigate the type and strength (1) of the relationships between demographic measures and epidemic, mobility and vaccination timelines during our established time window; (2) of the bidirectional coupling between these timelines. We showed that the wide between-state differences in epidemic outcome correspond to between-state differences in demographic measures (such as density, income, political affiliation). As a potential underlying mechanism, we found that demographic measures are also predictive of the degree of coupling between epidemic timelines (on one hand) and vaccination and mobility timelines (on the other hand), coupling which can be broadly interpreted as the populations behavioral response to the epidemic. In support of this idea, our analysis shows this response to be tightly correlated with epidemic outcome. This suggests that a states demographic profile may be invaluable to generating predictions on the epidemic evolution in the respective state, and that this information may be used to understand the weaknesses of a state and how to compensate for them to improve epidemic outcome (e.g., via state centralized incentives, and customized mitigation strategies).
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Pareto-based evaluation of national responses to COVID-19 pandemic shows that saving lives and protecting economy are non-trade-off objectives 94%
- Assessing the Impact of Human Mobility to Predict Regional Excess Death in Ecuador 94%
- Lockdown related travel behavior undermines the containment of SARS-CoV-2 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Archetypal analysis of COVID-19 in Montana, USA, March 13, 2020 to April 26, 2022 95%
- Tracking the Dynamics and Allocating Tests for COVID-19 in Real-Time: an Acceleration Index with an Application to French Age Groups and Départements * 94%
- Understanding mental health trends during COVID-19 pandemic in the United States using network analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Multivariate Forecasting Model for the COVID-19 Hospital Census Based on Local Infection Incidence 93%
- A Predictive Modelling Framework for COVID-19 Transmission to Inform the Management of Mass Events 92%
- Isolation Considered Epidemiological Model for the Prediction of COVID-19 Trend in Tokyo, Japan 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- High connectivity and human movement limits the impact of travel time on infectious disease transmission 94%
- A semi-parametric, state-space compartmental model with time-dependent parameters for forecasting COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths 94%
- Estimating data-driven COVID-19 mitigation strategies for safe university reopening 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.