Back

Machine-learning-based predictions of caloricrestriction associations across ageing-related genes

Vega-Magdaleno, G. D.; Bespalov, V.; Zheng, Y.; Freitas, A.; de Magalhaes, J. P.

2021-07-19 bioinformatics
10.1101/2021.07.17.452785 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Caloric restriction (CR) is the most studied pro-longevity intervention; however, a complete understanding of its underlying mechanisms remains elusive, and new research directions may emerge from the identification of novel CR-related genes and CR-related genetic features. This work used a Machine Learning (ML) approach to classify ageing-related genes as CR-related or NotCR-related using 9 different types of predictive features: PathDIP pathways, two types of features based on KEGG pathways, two types of Protein-Protein Interactions (PPI) features, Gene Ontology (GO) terms, Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) expression features, Gene-Friends co-expression features and protein sequence descriptors. Our findings suggested that features biased towards curated knowledge (i.e. GO terms and biological pathways), had the greatest predictive power, while unbiased features (mainly gene expression and co-expression data) have the least predictive power. Moreover, a combination of all the feature types diminished the predictive power compared to predictions based on curated knowledge. Feature importance analysis on the two most predictive classifiers mostly corroborated existing knowledge and supported recent findings linking CR to the Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2 (NRF2) signalling pathway and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR). We then used the two strongest combinations of feature type and ML algorithm to predict CR-relatedness among ageing-related genes currently lacking CR-related annotations in the data, resulting in a set of promising candidate CR-related genes (GOT2, GOT1, TSC1, CTH, GCLM, IRS2 and SESN2) whose predicted CR-relatedness remain to be validated in future wet-lab experiments.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biogerontology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.3%
2
Aging Cell
165 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.4%
3
Aging
75 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
4
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
5
GeroScience
109 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.6%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 6%
5.5%
7
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
9
Antioxidants
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
10
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.7%
12
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
13
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
15
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.5%
17
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.4%
18
Neurobiology of Aging
107 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
20
Experimental Gerontology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
21
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.0%
22
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.0%
23
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
24
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
26
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.9%
27
Biology
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
29
Computational Biology and Chemistry
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.6%