Back

Population model of Temnothorax albipennis as a distributed dynamical system: I. self-consistent threshold is an emergent property in combination of quorum sensing and chemical perception of limited resource

Qiu, S.

2021-07-14 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2021.07.14.452298 bioRxiv
Show abstract

House hunting of ant, such as Temnothorax albipennis, has been shown to be a distributed dynamical system. Such a system includes agent-based algorithm [1], with agents in different roles including nest exploration, nest assessment, quorum sensing, and brood item transportation. Such an algorithm, if used properly, can be applied on artificial intelligent system, like robotic swarms. Despite of its complexity, we are focusing on the quorum sensing mechanism, which is also observed in bacteria model. In bacterial model, multiple biochemical networks co-exist within each cell, including binding of autoinducer and cognate receptors, and phosphorylation-dephosphorylation cycle. In ant hunting, we also have ant commitment to the nest, mimicking binding between autoinducer and cognate receptors. We also have assessment ant specific to one nest and information exchange between two assessment ants corresponding to different nests, which is similar process to the phosphorylation-dephosphorylation cycle in bacteria quorum sensing network. Due to the similarity between the two models, we borrow the idea from bacteria quorum sensing to clarify the definition of quorum threshold through biological plausible mechanism related to limited resource model. We further made use of the contraction analysis to explore the trade-off between decision split and decision consensus within ant population. Our work provides new generation model for understanding how ant adapt to the changing environment during quorum sensing.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.6%
2
Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.9%
4
Biosystems
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.5%
7
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.2%
8
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
9
Neural Computation
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
10
Physical Biology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
11
Genes to Cells
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.4%
14
Vaccines
198 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
16
Physical Review Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
17
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
18
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Neural Networks
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
24
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
23 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
25
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.6%