Intravenous Iron Decreases Rehospitalizations but Does not Change mortality in Patients Admitted with Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency: A Systematic review and Meta-analysis
Baral, N.; Karki, N. R.; Akram, I.; Khan, A.; Adhikari, G.; Rauniyar, R.; Abdelazeem, B.; Dhungana, S. K.; Ranabhat, B.; Kunadi, A.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe role of intravenous (IV) iron in chronic heart failure has been well studied, however, its role in acute heart failure (AHF) is less well-known. Including the recent AFFIRM-HF trial, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to highlight the role of IV iron in AHF with iron deficiency. HypothesisWe hypothesized that IV iron doesnt change mortality or heart failure re-hospitalization rates in patients with AHF with iron deficiency. MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies published from inception till June 30, 2021. We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE (embase.com), and Cochrane database including only RCTs and Cohort studies. We also included one prospective and one retrospective Cohort studies and two RCTs in our meta-analysis. Eligible studies included adults with AHF, left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40%-50%, and able to receive IV iron therapy. Outcomes included re-hospitalization rates and overall mortality from 30 days to 52 weeks post randomization (in one RCT). We used random-effects model calculating Risk Ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) using Review Manger 5.4 software. I2statistics was used to assess heterogeneity. ResultsThere were total 1561 participants in both groups (IV iron and placebo/control) of four studies. The controls were comparable in both cohort studies and both the RCTs were well matched. Our results showed re-hospitalization in 278 of 833 (33.37%) patients in the IV iron/exposure group and 337 of 728 (0.46%) patients in the placebo/control group. The pooled result showed that the risk of rehospitalization was comparable across both groups (RR 0.85, 95%CI 0.62-1.17; I2=45%, P=0.14). However, subgroup analysis, including RCTs only showed that IV iron decreases re-hospitalization rate by 28% compared to placebo (RR 0.72, 95% CI: 0.64, 0.82, I2=0%, P<0.00001) but didnt improve mortality when compared to placebo (RR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.73, 1.30, I2 =0%). ConclusionsIV iron showed significant improvement in re-hospitalization rate for AHF hospitalizations in iron deficient patients but didnt improve overall mortality. We need larger RCTs to further validate its effect on mortality.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors and outcomes of Cardiac Dyssynchrony among patients with heart failure attending Benjamin Mkapa Hospital in Dodoma, central Tanzania: A protocol of prospective-longitudinal study 96%
- Assessing Red Blood Cell Distribution Width in Vietnamese Heart Failure Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study 95%
- Predictors of successful weaning from Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (V-A ECMO): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Vascular Comorbidities Worsen Prognosis of Patients with Heart Failure Hospitalized with COVID-19 95%
- Multispecialty multidisciplinary input into comorbidities in heart failure reduces hospitalisation and clinic attendance 93%
- Machine learning approaches to predict 30-day mortality following percutaneous coronary intervention in an Australian population 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Face-to-face interventions to encourage enrolment in cardiac rehabilitation; a scoping review protocol 94%
- Performance of digital Early Warning Score (NEWS2) in a cardiac specialist setting: retrospective cohort study 92%
- Troponin Is Independently Associated With Death In Patients With COVID: A Retrospective Study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.