Using deep learning to analyze the compositeness of musculoskeletal aging reveals that spine, hip and knee age at different rates, and are associated with different genetic and non-genetic factors
Le Goallec, A.; Diai, S.; Collin, S.; Vincent, T.; Patel, C. J.
Show abstract
With age, the musculoskeletal system undergoes significant changes, leading to diseases such as arthritis and osteoporosis. Due to the aging of the world population, the prevalence of such diseases is therefore expected to starkly increase in the coming decades. While numerous biological age predictors have been developed to assess musculoskeletal aging, it remains unclear whether these different approaches and data capture a single aging process, or if the diverse joints and bones in the body age at different rates. In the following, we leverage 42,000 full body, spine, hip and knee X-ray images and musculoskeletal biomarkers from the UK Biobank and use artificial intelligence to build the most accurate musculoskeletal aging predictor to date (RMSE=2.65{+/-}0.01 years; R-Squared=87.6{+/-}0.1%). Our predictor is composite and can be used to assess spine age, hip age and knee age, in addition to general musculoskeletal aging. We find that accelerated musculoskeletal aging is moderately correlated between these different musculoskeletal dimensions (e.g hip vs. knee: Pearson correlation=.351{+/-}.004). Musculoskeletal aging is heritable at more than 35%, and the genetic factors are partially shared between joints (e.g hip vs. knee: genetic correlation=.52{+/-}.04). We identified single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with accelerated musculoskeletal aging in approximately ten genes for each musculoskeletal dimension. General musculoskeletal aging is for example associated with a TBX15 variant linked to Cousin syndrome and acromegaloid facial appearance syndrome. Finally, we identified biomarkers, clinical phenotypes, diseases, environmental and socioeconomic variables associated with accelerated musculoskeletal aging in each dimension. We conclude that, while the aging of the different components of the musculoskeletal system is connected, each bone and joint can age at significantly different rates.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Using deep learning to predict age from liver and pancreas magnetic resonance images allows the identification of genetic and non-genetic factors associated with abdominal aging 99%
- Compression of morbidity by interventions that steepen the survival curve 96%
- Integrative epigenetics and transcriptomics identify aging genes in human blood 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- DNA methylation clocks struggle to distinguish inflammaging from healthy aging, but feature rectification improves coherence and enhances detection of inflammaging 96%
- Epigenetic clock and DNA methylation analysis of porcine models of aging and obesity 96%
- Development of a novel aging clock based on chromatin accessibility 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- voyAGEr: free web interface for the analysis of age-related gene expression alterations in human tissues 97%
- A mathematical model that predicts human biological age from physiological traits identifies environmental and genetic factors that influence aging 97%
- The effect of 18 months lifestyle intervention on brain age assessed with resting-state functional connectivity 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.