Back

Construction of redesigned pMAL expression vector for easy and fast purification of active native antimicrobial peptides

Gardijan, L.; Miljkovic, M.; Obradovic, M.; Borovic, B.; Vukotic, G.; Jovanovic, G.; Kojic, M.

2021-05-26 bioengineering
10.1101/2021.05.26.445771 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Many protein expression and purification systems are commercially available to provide a sufficient amount of pure, soluble and active native protein, such as the pMAL system based on E. coli maltose binding protein tag (MBP). Adding specific amino acid tags to the N- or C-terminus of the protein increases solubility and facilitates affinity purification of proteins. However, many of expressed tagged proteins consequently lose functionality, particularly small peptides such as antimicrobial peptides (AMPs). Objective of this study was to redesign the pMAL expression vector in order to increase the efficacy of MBP tag separation from native peptides. Redesign of the pMAL expression vector included introduction of the His6 tag and the enterokinase cleavage site downstream from the original MBP tag and Xa cleavage site enabling purification of native and active peptide (P) following two-step affinity chromatography. In the first step the entire MBP-His6-P fusion protein is purified through binding to Ni-NTA agarose. In the second step, the purification was performed by adding mixture of amylose and Ni-NTA agarose resins following cleavage of the fusion protein with active His6 tagged enterokinase. This removes MBP-His6 and His6-enterokinase leaving pure native protein in solution. The redesigned pMAL vectors were optimized for cytoplasmic (pMALc5HisEk) and periplasmic (pMALp5HisEk) peptides expression. Two-step purification protocol was successfully applied in purification of active native AMPs, lactococcin A and human {beta}-defensin. Taken together, we established the optimal conditions and pipeline for overexpression and purification of large amount of native peptides, that can be implemented in any laboratory.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.9%
2
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.5%
4
Protein Expression and Purification
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.6%
6
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
8
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
9
Microbial Cell Factories
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
10
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
BMC Biotechnology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
ACS Infectious Diseases
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
17
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
18
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
19
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
21
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
23
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
28
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
29
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
30
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%