Efficacy of Sofosbuvir plus Ledipasvir in Egyptian patients with COVID-19 compared to standard treatment: Randomized controlled trial
Elgohary, M. A.-S.; Hasan, E. M.; Ibrahim, A. A.; Ahmed, M. F.; Abdel-Rahman, R. Z.; Zaki, A. I.; Elaatar, M. B.; Elnagar, M. T.; Emam, M. E.; Hamada, M. M.; Abdel-Hamid, T. M.; Abdel-Hafez, A. S.; Seadawy, M. G.; Fatoh, A. R.; Elsaied, M. A.; Sakr, M. A.-R.; Elkady, A. O.; Shehata, M. M.; Nawar, O. M.; Selem, M. A.-e.; Abd-aal, M. S.; Lotfy, H. H.; Elnagdy, T. R.; Helmy, S.; Mubark, M. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundCOVID-19 is a pandemic disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, which is an RNA virus similar to HCV in the replication process. Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir is an approved drug by the FDA to treat HCV infection. This study investigates the efficacy of Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir as a treatment for patients with moderate COVID-19 infection.. MethodsThis is a single-blinded parallel-randomized controlled trial. The participants were randomized equally into the intervention group received Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (S.L. group), and the control group received Oseltamivir, Hydroxychloroquine, and Azithromycin (OCH group). The primary outcomes were the cure rate over time and the incidence of serious adverse events. The secondary outcomes included the laboratory findings. ResultsTwo hundred and fifty patients were divided equally into each group. Both groups were similar regarding gender, but age was higher in the S.L. group (p=0.001). In the S.L. group, 89 (71.2%) patients were cured, while only 51 (40.8%) patients were cured in the OCH group. The cure rate was significantly higher in the S.L. group (RR=1.75, p<0.001). Kaplan-Meir plot showed a considerably higher cure over time in the S.L. group (Log-rank test, p=0.032). There were no deaths in the S.L. group, but there were six deaths (4.8%) in the OCH group (RR=0.08, p=0.013). Seven patients (5.6%) in the S.L. group and six patients (4.8%) in the OCH group were admitted to ICU (RR=1.17, P=0.776). There was no significant difference between treatment groups regarding Total Leukocyte Count, Neutrophils count, Lymph and Urea. ConclusionSofosbuvir/ledipasvir is suggestive of being effective in treating patients with moderate COVID-19 infection. Further studies are needed to compare Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir with the new treatment protocols.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of vaccination and risk factors on COVID-19 mortality amid delta wave in Libya: a single centre cohort study 96%
- Treatment Profiles And Clinical Outcomes Of COVID-19 Patients At Private Hospital In Jakarta 95%
- Characteristics and outcome profile of Hospitalized African COVID-19 patients: The Ethiopian Context 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Relative expression of pro-inflammatory molecules in COVID-19 patients manifested disease severities 96%
- Comprehensive genomic, immunological and clinical analysis of COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infections: a prospective, comparative cohort study 94%
- Risk factors for bacterial infections in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19: A case control study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Jinhua Qinggan Granules for Nonhospitalized COVID-19 Patients: a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Controlled Trial 96%
- Is the infection of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant associated with the outcomes of COVID-19 patients? 95%
- Clinical findings in critical ill patients infected with SARS-Cov-2 in Guangdong Province, China: a multi-center, retrospective, observational study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of Antibody Cocktail Therapy Combined with Casirivimab and Imdevimab on Clinical Outcome for Covid-19 patients in A Real-Life Setting: A Single Institute Analysis 96%
- A shorter symptom-onset to remdesivir treatment (SORT) interval is associated with a lower mortality in moderate-to-severe COVID-19: A real-world analysis 95%
- Favorable outcome on viral load and culture viability using Ivermectin in early treatment of non-hospitalized patients with mild COVID-19, A double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Composite interventions on outcomes of severely and critically ill patients with COVID-19 in Shanghai, China 94%
- Efficacy of Molnupiravir in reducing the risk of severe outcome in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: a real-life full-matched case-control study (SAVALO Study) 93%
- Echinacea as a Potential Force against Coronavirus Infections? A Mini-Review of Randomized Controlled Trials in Adults and Children 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.