COVID-19 Pandemic and Academic Speculation of Medical Students of Bangladesh: A Cross-sectional, Comparative Study
Johora, F.; Abbasy, A. A.; Jeenia, F. T.; Bhowmik, M. C.; Moitra, P. M.; Mahboob, S.; Ferdoush, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundCOVID-19 pandemic has caused unprecedented disruptions worldwide including education system. While the necessary focus has been on patient care andwellbeing of healthcare professionals, the impacts on medical students need to be discussed. MethodsThis cross-sectional comparative study was conducted to evaluate the academic speculation of medical students studying in government and non-government institute during COVID-19 pandemic. A structured questionnaire survey linked in the google form was used as study instrument and was distributed among study population through email, messenger, whatsapp and other social media. Total 1020 students were participated in the study ResultsIn this research, 441 (43.24%) and 579 (56.77%) students were from government and non-government medical colleges respectively. Opinion of both group was almost similar regarding disruption of medical education, loss of clinical skills and competency, future career plan, and stress and anxiety but significant differences were observed between both group regarding issue of financial burden, meaningful learning opportunities, fear of getting infected and maintenance of social distancing in hostel. ConclusionThe study revealed similar kind of viewpoint about disruption of education, loss of clinical skill and competency, changing aspects of future career plan and increased level of stress and anxiety among medical students of government and non-government institutes of Bangladesh but different speculations were found regarding issue of financial burden, meaningful learning opportunities, fear of getting infected and possibility of maintenance of social distancing in hostel.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Health-Related Quality of Life and Coping Strategies adopted by COVID-19 survivors: A nationwide cross-sectional study in Bangladesh 97%
- Community’s misconception about COVID-19 and its associated factors: Evidence from a cross-sectional study in Bangladesh 97%
- The knowledge and practice towards COVID-19 pandemic prevention among residents of Ethiopia. An online cross-sectional study. 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceptions, attitudes, and challenges regarding continuing professional development among Ethiopian Medical Laboratory professionals: A mixed-method study 95%
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 94%
- Competency for Japanese Novice Medical Laboratory Scientists: A Delphi Method 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative study between first and second wave of COVID-19 deaths in India - a single center study 95%
- Data Driven Monitoring in Community Based Management of SAM children using Psychometric Techniques: An Operational Framework 93%
- Impact of mHealth interventions on antenatal and postnatal care utilization in low and middle-income countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Self-learning on COVID-19 among medical students and their preparedness to participate in government's COVID-19 response in Bhutan: a cross-sectional study 96%
- Psychosocial Factors of Stigma and Relationship to Healthcare Service among Adolescents Living With HIV/AIDS in Kano State, Nigeria 94%
- Determinants of infant formula feeding in Debre Berhan city: A community-based cross-sectional study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Women’s Awareness of Obstetric Fistula and its Associated Factors Among Reproductive-Age Women in Ethiopia: A Multilevel Analysis Based on National Survey Data 95%
- COVID-19 Vaccine hesitancy in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A mixed-methods study 95%
- Risk Factors for Non-Communicable Diseases among Bangladeshi Adults: An Application of Generalized Linear Mixed Model on Multilevel Demographic and Health Survey Data 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.