Objective and Subjective COVID-19 Vaccine Reactogenicity by Age and Vaccine Manufacturer
Presby, D.; Capodilupo, E.
Show abstract
Several vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have been granted emergency use authorization from the United States Food and Drug Administration and similar regulatory bodies abroad to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. While these vaccines have been shown to be extremely safe, transient side-effects lasting 24-48 hours post-vaccination have been reported. Here we conducted a retrospective analysis of 50977 subscribers to the WHOOP platform (33119 males, 17858 females; total of 65686 unique responses) who received either the AstraZeneca (AZ, n=2093), Janssen/Johnson & Johnson (J&J&J, n=3888), Moderna (n=23776; M1, 14553 first dose; M2, 9223 second dose), or Pfizer/BioNTech (n=35929; P&B1, 22387 first dose; P&B2, 13542 second dose) vaccines using data collected through April 14, 2021. Subjective reactogenicity was assessed using self-reported surveys. Results from these surveys indicated that the odds of self-reporting an adverse event after vaccination depend on gender, age, and manufacturer. Objectively measured cardiovascular (resting heart rate, RHR; heart rate variability, HRV) and sleep (total sleep duration, % light sleep, and % restorative sleep [a combination of REM and slow wave sleep]) metrics were assessed using a wrist-worn biometric device (Whoop Inc, Boston, MA, USA) and compared to the same day of the week, one week prior. Data are presented as a percent change from baseline {+/-} 95% confidence intervals. On the night after vaccination, RHR was higher (AZ: 13.5{+/-}0.76%; J&J&J: 16.5{+/-}0.64%; M1: 2.86{+/-}0.19%; M2: 9.3{+/-}0.53%; P&B1: 1.18{+/-}0.14%; P&B2: 13.5{+/-}0.36%) and HRV (AZ: -21.8{+/-}1.47%; J&J&J: - 25.6{+/-}1.15%; M1: -4.8{+/-}055%; M2: -19.9{+/-}1.33%; P&B1: -1.7{+/-}0.45%; P&B2: 8.60{+/-}1.10%) was lower than baseline levels. As for sleep metrics, total sleep was lower after the AZ and J&J&J vaccines (AZ: -3.7{+/-}0.98%; J&J&J: -3.8{+/-}0.80%; M1: 0.94{+/-}0.32%; M2: 0.14{+/-}0.80%; P&B1: 1.10{+/-}0.25%; P&B2: 0.35{+/-}0.63%); for AZ, J&J&J and the second dose of Moderna and P&B, a greater percentage of sleep post-vaccination came from light sleep (AZ: 9.24{+/-}1.22%; J&J&J: 13.8{+/-}1.02%; M1: 1.73{+/-}0.40%; M2: 8.02{+/-}0.99%; P&B1: 0.44{+/-}0.31%; P&B2: 2.54{+/-}0.74%) and a lower percentage from restorative sleep (AZ: -9.21{+/-}1.27%; J&J&J: -12.6{+/-}1.00%; M1: 0.16{+/-}0.43%; M2: -8.31{+/-}1.05%; P&B1: 1.27{+/-}0.34%; P&B2: -1.36{+/-}0.83%) than the week prior. Across all objective metrics measured, there were general trends that indicated an attenuated response in older populations and a larger response after the second dose for the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines (AstraZeneca second dose not analyzed). Importantly, the effects of the vaccines on cardiovascular and sleep measures were transient and returned to baseline by the second night following vaccination (P > 0.05 or absolute Cohens d < 0.25). In summary, these results confirm the previously observed subjective symptomatology trends, and for the first time show that objectively measured cardiovascular and sleep parameters are altered the night after vaccination. Moreover, these results suggest that the response may be different between vaccine manufacturers and may be modified by age and larger after the second dose. This information can be used to inform policy makers and employers considering offering paid time off for vaccination, as well as individuals planning their commitments post-vaccination.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of immunization, adverse events, and efficacy of a fourth dose of BNT162b2 vaccine 92%
- Safety and efficacy of two immunization schedules with an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in adults. A randomized non-inferiority clinical trial 92%
- Persistent health issues, adverse events of significant concern, and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination- findings from a real-world cohort study of healthcare workers in north India 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity and safety of a recombinant adenovirus type-5 COVID-19 vaccine in adults: data from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, phase 3 trial in Russia 92%
- Within-subjects ultra-short sleep-wake protocol for characterising circadian variations in retinal function 91%
- Factors indicating intention to vaccinate with a COVID-19 vaccine among older U.S. Adults 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Changes of evening exposure to electronic devices during the COVID-19 lockdown affect the time course of sleep disturbances 90%
- Sleep and Diurnal Rest-Activity Rhythm Disturbances in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease 90%
- Evaluation of Dreem headband for sleep staging and EEG spectral analysis in people living with Alzheimer’s and older adults 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sleep duration irregularity and risk for incident cardiovascular disease in the UK Biobank 87%
- Insomnia and early incident atrial fibrillation: A 16-year cohort study of younger men and women Veterans 86%
- Critical temperature thresholds for identifying vulnerability to heat-related excess cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- OBESITY MAY HAMPER SARS-CoV-2 VACCINE IMMUNOGENICITY 92%
- A prospective observational safety study on ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 corona virus vaccine (recombinant) use in healthcare workers- first results from India 90%
- Safety and Immunogenicity of an Inactivated Recombinant Newcastle Disease Virus Vaccine Expressing SARS-CoV-2 Spike: Interim Results of a Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 1/2 Trial 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.