COVID-19 vaccine perceptions: An observational study on Reddit
Kumar, N.; Corpus, I.; Hans, M.; Harle, N.; Yang, N.; McDonald, C.; Sakai, S. N.; Janmohamed, K. A.; Tang, W.; Schwartz, J. L.; Jones-Jang, S. M.; Saha, K.; Memon, S. A.; Bauch, C.; Chaudhury, M. D.; Papakyriakopoulos, O.; Tucker, J. D.; Goyal, A.; Tyagi, A.; Khoshnood, K.; Omer, S.
Show abstract
ObjectivesAs COVID-19 vaccinations accelerate in many countries, narratives skeptical of vaccination have also spread through social media. Open online forums like Reddit provide an opportunity to quantitatively examine COVID-19 vaccine perceptions over time. We examine COVID-19 misinformation on Reddit following vaccine scientific announcements. MethodsWe collected all posts on Reddit from January 1 2020 - December 14 2020 (n=266,840) that contained both COVID-19 and vaccine-related keywords. We used topic modeling to understand changes in word prevalence within topics after the release of vaccine trial data. Social network analysis was also conducted to determine the relationship between Reddit communities (subreddits) that shared COVID-19 vaccine posts, and the movement of posts between subreddits. ResultsThere was an association between a Pfizer press release reporting 90% efficacy and increased discussion on vaccine misinformation. We observed an association between Johnson and Johnson temporarily halting its vaccine trials and reduced misinformation. We found that information skeptical of vaccination was first posted in a subreddit (r/Coronavirus) which favored accurate information and then reposted in subreddits associated with antivaccine beliefs and conspiracy theories (e.g. conspiracy, LockdownSkepticism). ConclusionsOur findings can inform the development of interventions where individuals determine the accuracy of vaccine information, and communications campaigns to improve COVID-19 vaccine perceptions. Such efforts can increase individual- and population-level awareness of accurate and scientifically sound information regarding vaccines and thereby improve attitudes about vaccines. Further research is needed to understand how social media can contribute to COVID-19 vaccination services. FundingStudy was funded by the Yale Institute for Global Health and the Whitney and Betty MacMillan Center for International and Area Studies at Yale University. The funding bodies had no role in the design, analysis or interpretation of the data in the study.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mild Adverse Events of Sputnik V Vaccine Extracted from Russian Language Telegram Posts via BERT Deep Learning Model 92%
- Fear of Infection and Sufficient Vaccine Reservation Information Might Drive Rapid Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination in Japan: Evidence from Twitter Analysis 92%
- Users’ Reactions on Announced Vaccines against COVID-19 Before Marketing in France: Analysis of Twitter posts 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of information about COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness and side effects on behavioural intentions: two online experiments 92%
- Positive attribute framing increases COVID-19 booster vaccine intention for unfamiliar vaccines 92%
- Self-Reported SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination is Consistent with Electronic Health Record Data among the COVID-19 Community Research Partnership 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.