Back

Correcting COVID-19 PCR Prevalence for False Positives in the Presence of Vaccination Immunity

Halem, M.

2021-05-02 epidemiology
10.1101/2021.04.06.21255029 medRxiv
Show abstract

Since the first analysis was published on 7 April 2021 the PCR test positivity rate has dropped significantly below the then estimated false positive rate (FPR) of 1.16% using the exponential decay to FPR model. Therefore, the estimate has been rejected and a new model was developed. Using the ONS infection surveys assumption (PCR FPR rate below 0.1%) the new model splits the test time series data into two periods based on a change in transmissibility that coincides with the reopening of England schools on 8 March. The new model provides for two base levels of exponential decay (for each periods transmissibility) combined with a single decay rate increase dependent on vaccination. Because the FPR is relatively insignificant compared to current PCR test positives, it cannot be statistically separated using currently available England epidemic time series data by the non-linear least squares estimation technique. Therefore, the FPR factor is temporarily dropped in the least squares regression. The new model is stable in that it reasonably predicts through the most current available data (25 April) the future test prevalence using parameters estimated with 29 March data. Thus far, the estimate parameters remain within their original confidence intervals as successive days are added to the time series. Of potential usefulness is the current estimate for change in decay rate per mean vaccination rate, currently estimated at approximately 10.7% (CI: 8.8% - 12.6%). The estimate should be used with caution as other unforeseen factors could cause the model to misestimate.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.7%
2
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
3
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.5%
5
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
8
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
9
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.4%
11
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
13
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
14
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
15
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
19
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
21
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Swiss Medical Weekly
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
25
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
COVID
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
28
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
29
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
30
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%