Correcting COVID-19 PCR Prevalence for False Positives in the Presence of Vaccination Immunity
Halem, M.
Show abstract
Since the first analysis was published on 7 April 2021 the PCR test positivity rate has dropped significantly below the then estimated false positive rate (FPR) of 1.16% using the exponential decay to FPR model. Therefore, the estimate has been rejected and a new model was developed. Using the ONS infection surveys assumption (PCR FPR rate below 0.1%) the new model splits the test time series data into two periods based on a change in transmissibility that coincides with the reopening of England schools on 8 March. The new model provides for two base levels of exponential decay (for each periods transmissibility) combined with a single decay rate increase dependent on vaccination. Because the FPR is relatively insignificant compared to current PCR test positives, it cannot be statistically separated using currently available England epidemic time series data by the non-linear least squares estimation technique. Therefore, the FPR factor is temporarily dropped in the least squares regression. The new model is stable in that it reasonably predicts through the most current available data (25 April) the future test prevalence using parameters estimated with 29 March data. Thus far, the estimate parameters remain within their original confidence intervals as successive days are added to the time series. Of potential usefulness is the current estimate for change in decay rate per mean vaccination rate, currently estimated at approximately 10.7% (CI: 8.8% - 12.6%). The estimate should be used with caution as other unforeseen factors could cause the model to misestimate.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Threshold analyses on rates of testing, transmission, and contact for COVID-19 control in a university setting 94%
- A hierarchical Bayesian latent class mixture model with censorship for detection of linear temporal changes in antibiotic resistance 94%
- Does the Data Tell the True Story? A Modelling Study of Early COVID-19 Pandemic Suppression and Mitigation Strategies in Ghana 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) vaccines for reducing susceptibility to infection with the Delta variant (B.1.617.2) of SARS-CoV-2 95%
- Preventing a cluster from becoming a new wave in settings with zero community COVID-19 cases 93%
- Comparing alternative cholera vaccination strategies in Maela refugee camp using a transmission model 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Measuring the unknown: an estimator and simulation study for assessing case reporting during epidemics 94%
- Estimation of the force of infection and infectious period of skin sores in remote Australian communities using interval-censored data 94%
- The role of children in the spread of COVID-19: Using household data from Bnei Brak, Israel, to estimate the relative susceptibility and infectivity of children 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.