Epigenetic clock and methylation studies in dogs
Horvath, S.; Lu, A. T.; Haghani, A.; Zoller, J. A.; Brooke, R. T.; Raj, K.; Plassais, J.; Hogan, A. N.; Ostrander, E. A.
Show abstract
DNA methylation profiles have been used to develop biomarkers of aging known as epigenetic clocks, which predict chronological age with remarkable accuracy and show promise for inferring health status as an indicator of biological age. Epigenetic clocks were first built to monitor human aging but the principles underpinning them appear to be evolutionarily conserved, as they have now been successfully developed for over 120 mammalian species. Here we describe reliable and highly accurate epigenetic clocks shown to apply to 51 domestic dog breeds. The methylation profiles were generated using a custom array with DNA sequences that are conserved across all mammalian species (HorvathMammalMethylChip40). Canine epigenetic clocks were constructed to estimate age and also predict mortality risk by estimating average time-to-death. We also present two highly accurate human-dog dual species epigenetic clocks (R=0.97), which may facilitate the ready translation from canine to human use (or vice versa) of anti-aging treatments being developed for longevity and preventive medicine. Finally, epigenome-wide association studies herein reveal individual methylation sites that may underlie the inverse relationship between breed weight and lifespan. Overall, we describe robust biomarkers to measure aging and potentially health status in canines.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Rat leukocyte population dynamics predicts a window for intervention in aging. 97%
- The costs of competition: high social status males experience accelerated epigenetic aging in wild baboons 97%
- voyAGEr: free web interface for the analysis of age-related gene expression alterations in human tissues 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.