Back

Occupation as a risk factor for progression of chronic kidney disease: retrospective cohort study

Takada, D.; Kunisawa, S.; Kikuno, A.; Iritani, T.; Imanaka, Y.

2021-03-29 epidemiology
10.1101/2021.03.28.21254487 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSeveral social determinants of health are associated with the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). We compared the risk of CKD progression among 18 occupational classifications using an annual health-checkup database. MethodsWe used the annual health checkup data and health insurance claims data of the Japan Health Insurance Association in Kyoto prefecture between April 2012 and March 2016. The primary outcome for survival analysis was defined as a more than 30% change in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from the first health checkup. We used the Cox proportional-hazards model for time-to-event analyses to estimate the hazard ratio, and 95% CIs for the primary outcome, adjusting for age, sex, eGFR, body mass index, blood pressure, blood sugar, dyslipidemia, uric acid, urinary protein, and existence of kidney diseases at first health checkup. ResultsWe analyzed 239,506 employees, and 1,736 (0.7%) individuals whose eGFR had decreased by 30% or more; the mean follow-up period was 2.8 years (standard deviation: 1.2 years). When we compared the risk for "manufacturing," five categories of industries ("information and communications"; "transport and postal services"; "accommodations, eating and drinking services"; "living-related and personal services and amusement service"; "medical, health care and welfare") were associated with a decline in the risk of eGFR after adjusting for the confounding factors and/or mediators. ConclusionsWe provided evidence that the risk of CKD progression depends on occupation type. Further research is needed to confirm the mechanism and causal relationships involved.

Published in Journal of Occupational Health · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.