Analyzing the Global Impact of COVID-19 Vaccination Progress: A Result-oriented Storytelling Approach
Dey, S. K.; Rahman, D. M. M.; Siddiqi, D. U. R.; Howlader, A.; Tushar, A.
Show abstract
The next big step in combating the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic will be gaining widespread acceptance of a vaccination campaign for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), but achieving high uptake need proper understandings. Many health professionals, researchers, statisticians, and programmers to track the viruses spread in different parts of the world have used various methods. However, the proliferation of vaccines produced by talented scientists around the world has sparked a strong desire to extract meaningful insights from available data. Until now, several vaccines against coronavirus disease (COVID-19) have been approved and are being distributed worldwide in various regions. This study aims to report the detailed data analysis and result-oriented storytelling of the COVID-19 vaccination program of different countries across the globe. To analyze the vaccination trend globally this research utilized two different open datasets provided by ourworldindata.org and worldometers.info. An exploratory data analysis (EDA) with interactive data visualization using various python libraries was conducted, and the results are presented in this article to better understand the impact of ongoing vaccination programs around the world. Apart from the valuable insights gained from the data of various countries, this investigation also included a comparison of the number of confirmed and death cases before and after vaccination to determine the efficacy of each vaccine in each country. The results show that a large number of people are still undecided about whether or not to get a COVID-19 vaccine, despite the viruss continued devastating effects on communities. Overall, our findings contribute to ongoing research aimed at informing policy on how to persuade the unvaccinated to be vaccinated.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptance and Attitudes Toward COVID-19 Vaccines: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jordan 96%
- Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Pakistan: The paradigm of Confidence, Convenience, and Complacency; A Cross-sectional study 96%
- Psychological antecedents towards COVID-19 vaccination using the Arabic 5C validated tool: An online study in 13 Arab countries 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health Belief, Planned Behavior, or Psychological Antecedents: What predicts COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy better among the Bangladeshi Adults? 94%
- Determinants of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Engagement in Algeria: A Population-based Study with Systematic Review of Studies from Arab Countries of the MENA Region 94%
- Identification, analysis and prediction of valid and false information related to vaccines from Romanian tweets 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Google Trends as a predictive tool for COVID-19 vaccinations in Italy: a retrospective infodemiological analysis 95%
- The Influence of Covid-19 Vaccine on Daily Cases, Hospitalization, and Death Rate in Tennessee: A Case Study in the United States 94%
- The influence of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern on national case fatality rates 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.