The Effectiveness Of Acb-Ip 1.0 Universal Pathogen Free Concentrated Cocktail Convalescent Plasma In COVID-19 Infection
Hemsinlioglu, C.; Pelit, N. B.; Yalcin, K.; Gunaydin, O. S.; Ozturk Sahin, N.; Savas Karagacli, E.; Elibol, O.; Demir, S. O.; Safak, E.; Turan, R. D.; Celebi, G.; Kocaoglu, M. E.; Sir Karakus, G.; Yurtsever, B.; Tastan, C.; Abanuz, S.; Cakirsoy, D.; Dilek Kancagi, D.; Torun, Z.; Seyis, U.; Elek, M.; Zengin, R.; Kocagoz, A. S.; Cuhadaroglu, C.; Birgen, N.; Ratip, S.; Ovali, E.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe efficacy of SARS-CoV2 standard single donor convalescent plasma varied according to the application time and most importantly the amount of antibody that is administered. Single donor plasma has some drawbacks; such as the insufficient levels of neutralizing antibody activities, the requirements of blood group compatibility, and the risk of infection transmission. In this study, the efficacy and safety of pathogen inactivated, isohemagglutinin-depleted (concentrated) and pooled convalescent plasma was investigated. MethodsIn this study, ACB-IP 1.0 convalescent plasma product was prepared as follows; first, convalescent plasma was collected from different donors, then pathogen-inactivation was carried-out, and isohemagglutinins were cryodepleted, respectively. Finally, concentrated convalescent plasma product was pooled and stored until use. A total of sixteen patients were treated with two different convalescent plasma products. Nine patients were treated with standard single donor convalescent plasma and seven were treated with pathogen-free, concentrated, pooled convalescent plasma (ACB-IP 1.0) between 01 March 2020 and 31 December 2020. The outcomes of these two plasma products were compared regarding SARS-CoV2 antibody titers, neutralizing antibody activities, length of hospitalization and mortality rates. ResultsFive out of six single donor plasma SARS-CoV2 antibody titers remained below 12 s/co, but the antibody titers of all ACB-IP 1.0 plasma were above 12 s/co. SARS-CoV2 total antibody titers of ACB-IP 1.0 plasma were statistically higher than the antibody titers of single donor plasma. Mean total plasma neutralizing antibody activity of ACB-IP 1.0 plasma (1.5421) was found statistically higher than single donor plasma (0.9642) in 1:256 dilution ({rho}=0.0087) The mortality rate of the patients treated with ACB-IP 1.0 plasma showed statistically lower (p: 0,033) than the patients treated with single donor plasma. The administration of either single donor plasma or ACB-IP 1.0 plasma to the patients within eight days significantly shortened the length of hospitalization compared to administration of either plasma to the patients later than eight days ({rho}= 0,0021) DiscussionPathogen-free, concentrated, pooled convalescent plasma may resolve the bias in SARS-CoV2 antibody titers and neutralizing antibody activities, without requiring blood group compatibility that allows patient accessibility in a shorter time and has safe plasma characteristic. This study indicates that ACB-IP 1.0 may be a superior product compared to standard single donor plasma.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Correlation Between SARS-COV-2 Antibody Screening By Immunoassay And Neutralizing Antibody Testing 97%
- ABO blood group type does not influence the level of SARS-CoV-2 antibody response in convalescent plasma donors 96%
- Patient ABO blood type is a major predictor of a positive DAT following a transfusion reaction 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of ABO blood group with COVID-19 severity, acute phase reactants and mortality 95%
- SpO 2 /FiO 2 Ratio as a Better Metric for Assessment of RBC Transfusion Effectiveness in Non-traumatic Critically Ill Patients with Physiologic Derangements 95%
- Distribution, genetic polymorphism and genotype prediction of rhesus blood group antigens among the Kurdish population of Zakho, Kurdistan Region, Iraq 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A comparison study of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody between male and female COVID-19 patients: a possible reason underlying different outcome between gender. 92%
- Relative expression of pro-inflammatory molecules in COVID-19 patients manifested disease severities 92%
- Probable causes and risk factors for positive SARS-CoV-2 test in recovered patients: Evidence from Brunei Darussalam 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modified Preparation Method of Ideal Platelet-Rich Fibrin Matrix (PRFM) from Whole Blood 96%
- The Role of Disease Severity and Demographics in the Clinical Course of COVID-19 Patients Treated with Convalescent Plasma 93%
- TissueGrinder, a novel technology for rapid generation of patient-derived single cell suspensions from solid tumors by mechanical tissue dissociation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A phase I/II trial to treat massive Africanized honeybee ( Apis mellifera ) stings using the new apilic antivenom 93%
- Immune-Based Prediction of COVID-19 Severity and Chronicity Decoded Using Machine Learning 92%
- Upregulation of Activation Induced Cell Markers (AIM) among Severe COVID-19 patients in Bangladesh 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.