Back

Comparison analysis on transcriptomic of different human trophoblast development model

Liu, Y.; Guo, Y.; Gao, Y.; Hu, G.; Ren, J.; Ma, J.; Cui, J.

2021-02-08 cell biology
10.1101/2021.02.06.430084 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AimsMultiple models of trophoblastic cell development were developed. However, systematic comparisons of these cell models are lacking. Methods and ResultsIn this study, first-trimester chorionic villus and decidua tissues were collected. Transcriptome data was acquired by RNA-seq and the expression levels of trophoblast specific transcription factors were identified by immunofluorescence and RNA-seq data analysis. Differentially expressed genes between chorionic villus and decidua tissues and its related biological functions were identified. We identified genes that were relatively highly expressed and enriched transcription factors in trophoblast cells of different trophoblast cell models. ConclusionsThis analysis is of certain significance for further exploration of the development of placenta and the occurrence of pregnancy-related diseases in the future. The datasets and analysis provide a useful source for the researchers in the field of the maternal-fetal interface and the establishment of pregnancy.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.3%
Similar papers in this journal
2
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.7%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.3%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
188 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
5
Genes
○ 144 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.4%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Genomics
○ 64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
7
Placenta
○ 22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
8
Biology of Reproduction
◐ 36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
9
Gene
○ 46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
10
BMC Genomics
○ 406 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
11
Frontiers in Genetics
○ 230 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
○ 494 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
13
The FASEB Journal
○ 194 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
14
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
○ 233 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
15
Heliyon
○ 152 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
16
Life Sciences
○ 27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
17
BioMed Research International
○ 28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
18
Biomolecules
○ 100 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
19
PROTEOMICS
○ 43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
20
Biology of Sex Differences
○ 32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
21
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.3%
22
F1000Research
○ 88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
23
Molecular Biology Reports
○ 21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
24
Bioscience Reports
● 27 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
25
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease
○ 26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
26
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
○ 84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
27
Biomedicines
○ 67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
28
Cell Proliferation
○ 12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
29
Cells
○ 249 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
30
Clinical and Translational Medicine
○ 31 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.