Mentorship as a strategy to improve research ability of students and young researchers in Africa: an exploratory study and initial findings on the CORE Africa Research Mentorship Scheme
Ngongalah, L.; Niba Rawlings, N.; Musisi, J. M.; Awanchiri, K.; Akwah, E.; Ngeh, E.; Ssemwanga, A.
Show abstract
Mentorship provides an opportunity to support skill development, improve research ability, promote interest in research and offer career advice. The need for research mentorship in Africa is well-recognised. However, there is scarce literature on the development of such programmes and their potential impacts on students and young researchers in Africa (SYRIA). This study documents the development of the CORE Africa Research Mentorship Scheme (CARMS), and reports the outcomes and challenges experienced over a two-year period, from 2018 to 2020. 41 mentors and mentees from Cameroon, Uganda and Nigeria participated in the programme. Mentors were based in Africa and the UK, while mentees were all based in Africa. Mentees gained knowledge and skills in various research areas including proposal writing, research methods, data analysis, report writing and research publication. Nine mentees gained their first research publication through the CARMS and three successfully completed their first grant proposal. Three mentees were supported by their mentor to develop PhD research proposals and five others gained skills that helped them secure paid research jobs. Eleven mentees have graduated from the programme, seven of which are currently enrolled as trainee mentors. Mentees appreciated the opportunity to improve on their research skills and felt that the programme gave them a safe environment to freely express their concerns. Main challenges encountered were: difficulty finding suitable mentors, communication barriers, poorly defined mentorship goals, dealing with mentees lack of knowledge/experience of basic research concepts and funding limitations. This programme had several positive impacts on the knowledge and skills of mentees and demonstrates the importance of mentorship in research capacity strengthening. Sustaining such programmes requires investments in training and development, to ensure that mentees are continuously and adequately supported.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A national professional development program fills mentoring gaps for postdoctoral researchers 95%
- Exploring Perceptions, Challenges, and Opportunities of UDS Health Professionals' Students and Faculty Regarding Community-Based Education Programs for Interprofessional Education-A study protocol. 95%
- Protocol For The Development Of A Core Outcome Set For Respectful Maternal And Newborn Care In A Low-Middle Income Setting 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mentorship in Health Research Institutions in Africa: A Systematic Review of Approaches, Benefits, Successes, Gaps and Challenges 96%
- Factors affecting trust in clinical trials conduct: Views of stakeholders from a qualitative study in Ghana 95%
- An emerging TIMER-2C framework for addressing barriers to research culture and productivity among local healthcare providers in the Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa: a qualitative study and modified Delphi approach 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices on Ebola Virus Disease: A Multi-Site Mixed Methods Survey on Preparedness in Rwanda 93%
- Acceptability and feasibility of strategies to shield the vulnerable during the COVID-19 outbreak: a qualitative study in six Sudanese communities 92%
- How best do we engage the general population in testing for COVID-19? 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving modelling for epidemic responses: reflections from members of the UK infectious disease modelling community on their experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- The feasibility of an objective measure of the parent-child relationship in health visiting practice: assessment of the Maternal Postnatal Attachment Scale 91%
- Accessibility, inclusivity, and implementation of COVID-19 clinical management guidelines early in the pandemic: a global survey 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Taxonomy of interventions at academic institutions to improve research quality 94%
- A cross-sectional audit and survey of Open Science and Data Sharing practices at The Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital 92%
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the 5C Scale to Identify Factors Associated With COVID-19 and Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy Among Healthcare Workers in Cape Town, South Africa – A Protocol 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.