Back

The Socioeconomic Impact of COVID-19 in Urban Informal Settlements

Gil, D.; Dominguez, P.; Undurraga, E. A.; Valenzuela, E.

2021-01-20 public and global health
10.1101/2021.01.16.21249935 medRxiv
Show abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has reached almost every corner of the world. Without a pharmaceutical solution, governments have been forced to implement regulations and public policies to control social behavior and prevent the spread of the virus. There is dramatic evidence of the social and economic effects of these measures and their disparate impact on vulnerable communities. Individuals living in urban informal settlements are in a structurally disadvantaged position to cope with a health crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper examines the socioeconomic impact of the crisis brought by the pandemic in informal settlements in Chile. We use a three-wave panel study to compare the situation in informal settlements before and during the health crisis. We show that households living in informal settlements are paying a high toll. Their employment loss is dramatic, substantially larger than the loss reported in the general population, and has particularly affected the inmigrant population. We also find that the pandemic has triggered neighborhood cooperation within the settlements. Targeted government assistance programs have reached these communities; however, this groups coverage is not enough to counteract the magnitude of the crisis. Our results suggest that governments, the non-profit sector, and the community need to urgently provide economic support and protections to individuals living in informal settlements and consider this opportunity for long-term improvements in these marginalized communities. HighlightsO_LIGovernments have implemented large-scale non-pharmaceutical interventions to control the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic C_LIO_LIThese measures have had dramatic social and economic effects on the population, particularly affecting vulnerable communities C_LIO_LIIndividuals living in urban informal settlements are in a structurally disadvantaged position to cope with this crisis C_LIO_LIUsing panel data, we document a dramatic employment loss among informal settlements dwellers, substantially larger than the general population C_LIO_LIThe pandemic has also triggered neighborhood cooperation within the settlements as well as targeted government assistance, but not enough to counteract the magnitude of the economic loss C_LI

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
23.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.0%
5
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
7
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 27%
2.1%
9
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
10
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
11
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
12
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
13
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
14
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
15
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
16
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
18
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
20
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
21
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
23
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
24
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
25
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
26
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.5%