Development of Predictive Risk Models for All-cause Mortality in Pulmonary Hypertension using Machine Learning
Zhou, J.; Wong, K. H. G.; Lee, S.; Liu, T.; Leung, K. S.; Jeevaratnam, K.; Cheung, B. M.; Wong, I. C.; Zhang, Q.; Tse, G.
Show abstract
BackgroundPulmonary hypertension, a progressive lung disorder with symptoms such as breathlessness and loss of exercise capacity, is highly debilitating and has a negative impact on the quality of life. In this study, we examined whether a multi-parametric approach using machine learning can improve mortality prediction. MethodsA population-based territory-wide cohort of pulmonary hypertension patients from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Significant predictors of all-cause mortality were identified. Easy-to-use frailty indexes predicting primary and secondary pulmonary hypertension were derived and stratification performances of the derived scores were compared. A factorization machine model was used for the development of an accurate predictive risk model and the results were compared to multivariate logistic regression, support vector machine, random forests, and multilayer perceptron. ResultsThe cohorts consist of 2562 patients with either primary (n=1009) or secondary (n=1553) pulmonary hypertension. Multivariate Cox regression showed that age, prior cardiovascular, respiratory and kidney diseases, hypertension, number of emergency readmissions within 28 days of discharge were all predictors of all-cause mortality. Easy-to-use frailty scores were developed from Cox regression. A factorization machine model demonstrates superior risk prediction improvements for both primary (precision: 0.90, recall: 0.89, F1-score: 0.91, AUC: 0.91) and secondary pulmonary hypertension (precision: 0.87, recall: 0.86, F1-score: 0.89, AUC: 0.88) patients. ConclusionWe derived easy-to-use frailty scores predicting mortality in primary and secondary pulmonary hypertension. A machine learning model incorporating multi-modality clinical data significantly improves risk stratification performance.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- iCPET calculator: a web-based application to standardize the calculation of alpha distensibility in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension 95%
- Age-stratified Prevalence and Relative Prognostic Significance of Traditional Atherosclerotic Risk Factors: A Report from the Nationwide Registry of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Japan 94%
- Cardiac Output During Exercise: Thermodilution versus Direct Fick 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Right Heart Remodeling in End-Stage Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and the Impact of Treatment Intensity 95%
- Predicting long-term prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a prospective nested case-control analysis for county-level health services 94%
- Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Survival in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Vascular Comorbidities Worsen Prognosis of Patients with Heart Failure Hospitalized with COVID-19 96%
- Effectiveness of An Impedance Cardiography Guided Treatment Strategy to Improve Blood Pressure Control in A Real-World Setting: Results from A Pilot Pragmatic Clinical Trial 96%
- Multispecialty multidisciplinary input into comorbidities in heart failure reduces hospitalisation and clinic attendance 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of candidate biomarkers and therapeutic agents for heart failure by bioinformatics analysis 95%
- Heart Rate n-Variability (HRnV) and Its Application to Risk Stratification of Chest Pain Patients in the Emergency Department 94%
- Postoperative glycemic variability as a predictor for one-year mortality following coronary artery bypass grafting: A retrospective cohort study 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.