Covid-19 Vaccine Efficacy: Accuracy, Uncertainty and Projection of Cases
Fu, W.; Li, J.; Scheet, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundTwo vaccine candidates for coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) have been announced by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna with above 90% efficacy. The efficacy of each vaccine changes between reports with no accuracy assessment. MethodsWe examined data in both vaccine trials, provided 95% confidence intervals, and projected the cases that would be prevented in communities of multi-million population. ResultsThe 95% confidence intervals reveal that the true vaccine efficacy could be as low as 86% for stated efficacy of 94.4% in an interim report, indicating the inaccuracy and uncertainty of efficacy point estimate. Both vaccines achieve an efficacy above 89% by the 95% confidence interval in updated reports. The Moderna vaccine would prevent more than 50,260 cases in communities of 1 million people with 1 year exposure. ConclusionsPoint estimates of vaccine efficacy transmit limited information. Corresponding statements of uncertainty, such as confidence intervals, should be provided and included in discussions of societal impact. The Covid-19 vaccines announced to date would prevent a substantial number of cases even at lower ends of the intervals.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Interpreting vaccine efficacy trial results for infection and transmission 95%
- Aggregating probabilistic predictions of the safety, efficacy, and timing of a COVID-19 vaccine 95%
- Resource Allocation for Different Types of Vaccines against COVID-19: Tradeoffs and Synergies between Efficacy and Reach 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Beyond the new normal: assessing the feasibility of vaccine-based elimination of SARS-CoV-2 94%
- Estimating the number of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections among vaccinated individuals in the United States—January–April, 2021 93%
- The impact of COVID-19 vaccination campaigns accounting for antibody-dependent enhancement 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Benefit-Risk Assessment Of COVID-19 Vaccine, Mrna (Mrna-1273) For Males Age 18-64 Years 94%
- Assessing the feasibility of Phase 3 vaccine trials against Marburg Virus Disease: a modelling study 93%
- Evaluation of statistical models of carriage to predict the impact of the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on invasive pneumococcal disease in Nigeria 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.