Back

Convalescent Plasma in COVID-19. Mortality-Safety First Results of the Prospective Multicenter FALP 001-2020 Trial

gazitua, r.; Briones, j. l.; Selman, C.; Villarroel-Espindola, F.; Aguirre, A.; Gonzalez-Steigmaier, R.; cereceda, K.; Mahave, M.; Rubio, B.; Ferrer-Rosende, P.; Sapunar, J.; Marsiglia, H.; Morales, R.; Yarad, F.; Balcells, M. E.; Rojas, L.; Nervi, B.; Nien, J. K.; Garate, J.; Prieto, C.; Palma, S.; Escobar, C.; bascunan, J.; Munoz, R.; Pinto, M.; Cardemil, D.; Navarrete, M.; Reyes, S.; Espinoza, V.; Yanez, N.; Caglevic, C.

2020-12-02 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.11.30.20218560 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe use of convalescent plasma (CP) to treat COVID-19 has shown promising results; however, its effectiveness remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and mortality of CP among patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Study Design and MethodsThis multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled clinical trial is currently being conducted at nine hospitals in Chile. Patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 who were still within 14 days since symptom onset were classified into four groups: Patients with cancer and severe COVID-19. Patients with cancer and non-severe COVID-19. Patients with severe COVID-19 and patients with non-severe COVID-19 only. The intervention involved two 200-cc. CP transfusions with anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG titers [≥] 1:320 collected from COVID-19-recovered donors. Results192 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 received CP transfusions. At the first transfusion, 90.6% fulfilled the criteria for severity, and 41.1% required mechanical ventilation. 11.5% of the patients had cancer. Overall 7-day and 30-day mortality since the first CP transfusion was 5.7% and 16.1% respectively. There were no differences at either time point in mortality between the four groups. Patients on mechanical ventilation when receiving CP had higher mortality rates than those who were not (22.8% vs. 11.5%; p = 0.037). Overall 30-day mortality was higher in patients over 65 than in younger patients (p = 0.019). Severe adverse events were reported in four patients (2.1%) with an overall transfusion-related lung injury rate of 1.56%. No CP-related deaths occurred. DiscussionCP is safe when used in patients with COVID-19 even when also presenting severity criteria or risk factors. Our mortality rate is comparable to reports from larger studies. Controlled clinical trials are required to determine efficacy. RegistrationNCT04384588

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 1%
13.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.4%
3
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.6%
4
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.0%
5
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
Transfusion
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
7
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
8
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
9
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
10
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
12
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
14
The American Journal of Pathology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
18
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
19
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
Infectious Diseases
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
21
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
22
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
23
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
24
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
28
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.7%
30
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%