Back

Optimizing Vaccine Allocation to Combat the COVID-19 Pandemic

Bertsimas, D.; Ivanhoe, J. K.; Jacquillat, A.; Li, M. L.; Previero, A.; Lami, O. S.; Bouardi, H. T.

2020-11-18 health policy
10.1101/2020.11.17.20233213 medRxiv
Show abstract

The outbreak of COVID-19 has spurred extensive research worldwide to develop a vaccine. However, when a vaccine becomes available, limited production and distribution capabilities will likely lead to another challenge: who to prioritize for vaccination to mitigate the near-end impact of the pandemic? To tackle that question, this paper first expands a state-of-the-art epidemiological model, called DELPHI, to capture the effects of vaccinations and the variability in mortality rates across subpopulations. It then integrates this predictive model into a prescriptive model to optimize vaccine allocation, formulated as a bilinear, non-convex optimization model. To solve it, this paper proposes a coordinate descent algorithm that iterates between optimizing vaccine allocations and simulating the dynamics of the pandemic. We implement the model and algorithm using real-world data in the United States. All else equal, the optimized vaccine allocation prioritizes states with a large number of projected cases and sub-populations facing higher risks (e.g., older ones). Ultimately, the optimized vaccine allocation can reduce the death toll of the pandemic by an estimated 10-25%, or 10,000-20,000 deaths over a three-month period in the United States alone. Highlights- This paper formulates an optimization model for vaccine allocation in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This model, referred to as DELPHI-V-OPT, integrates a predictive epidemiological model into a prescriptive model to support the allocation of vaccines across geographic regions (e.g., US states) and across risk classes (e.g., age groups). - This paper develops a scalable coordinate descent algorithm to solve the DELPHI-V-OPT model. The proposed algorithm converges effectively and in short computational times. Therefore, the proposed approach can be implemented efficiently, and allows extensive sensitivity analyses for scenario planning and policy analysis. - Computational results demonstrate that optimized vaccine allocation strategies can curb the death toll of the COVID-19 pandemic by an estimated at 10-25%, or 10,000-20,000 deaths over a three-month period in the United States alone. These results highlight the critical role of vaccine allocation to combat the COVID-19 pandemic, in addition to vaccine design and vaccine production.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Medical Decision Making
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 14%
13.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.8%
4
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.6%
7
Vaccine
203 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
8
Infectious Disease Modelling
54 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.3%
9
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.2%
10
Vaccines
198 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
11
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
12
Statistics in Medicine
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
13
Mathematical Biosciences
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.4%
15
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
16
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 34%
1.1%
18
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
COVID
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
24
Mathematical Medicine and Biology: A Journal of the IMA
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
Viruses
332 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
BMC Medical Education
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
27
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.6%