A fair efficacy formula for assessing the effectiveness of contact tracing applications
Fowler, A.
Show abstract
Mobile contact tracing apps have been developed by many countries in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Trials have focussed on unobserved population trials or staged scenarios aimed to simulate real life. No efficacy measure has been developed that assesses the fundamental ability of any proximity detection protocol to accurately detect, measure, and therefore assess the epidemiological risk that a mobile phone owner has been placed at. This paper provides a fair efficacy formula that can be applied to any mobile contact tracing app, using any technology, allowing its likely epidemiological effectiveness to be assessed. This paper defines such a formula and provides results for several simulated protocols as well as one real life protocol tested according to the standard methodology set out in this paper. The results presented show that protocols that use time windows greater than 30 seconds or that bucket their distance analogue (E.g. RSSI for Bluetooth) provide poor estimates of risk, showing an efficacy rating of less than 6%. The fair efficacy formula is shown in this paper to be able to be used to calculate the Efficacy of contact tracing variable value as used in two papers on using mobile applications for contact tracing [6]. The output from the formulae in this paper, therefore, can be used to directly assess the impact of technology on the spread of a disease outbreak. This formula can be used by nations developing contact tracing applications to assess the efficacy of their applications. This will allow them to reassure their populations and increase the uptake of contact tracing mobile apps, hopefully having an effect on slowing the spread of COVID-19 and future epidemics.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- How an election can be safely planned and conducted during a pandemic: Decision support based on a discrete event model 94%
- Estimating the impact of interventions against COVID-19: from lockdown to vaccination 94%
- Modelling digital and manual contact tracing for COVID-19 Are low uptakes and missed contacts deal-breakers? 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Neural Network Based Algorithm for Dynamically Adjusting Activity Targets to Sustain Exercise Engagement Among People Using Activity Trackers 91%
- Development and validation of risk scores for all-cause mortality for the purposes of a smartphone-based ‘general health score’ application: a prospective cohort study using the UK Biobank 89%
- Challenges for non-technical implementation of digital proximity tracing: early experiences from Switzerland 88%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Human behaviour, NPI and mobility reduction effects on COVID-19 transmission in different countries of the world 93%
- A Coupled Experimental and Statistical Approach for an Assessment of the Airborne Infection Risk in Event Locations 93%
- Modelling a potential zoonotic spillover event of H5N1 influenza 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.