Death by scientific method: Estimated mortality associated with the failure to conduct routine prospective cumulative systematic reviews in medicine and public health
Hahn, R. A.; Teutsch, S. M.
Show abstract
Failure to routinely assess the state of knowledge as new studies accumulate results in 1) non-use of effective interventions, 2) continued use of ineffective or harmful interventions, and 3) unnecessary research. We use a published cumulative meta-analysis of interventions to reduce the harms of acute myocardial infarctions (1966-1992), and applied population attributable risk to assess the mortality consequences of the failure to cumulatively assess the state of knowledge. Failure to use knowledge that would have been available with cumulative meta-analysis may have resulted in annual estimated mortality: 41,000 deaths from non-use of intravenous dilators, 35,000 deaths from non-use of aspirin, and 37,000 deaths annually from non-use of {beta}-blockers. Continued use of Class 1 anti-arrhythmic drugs, which would have been found to be harmful in 1981, resulted 39,000 deaths annually. Failure to routinely update the state knowledge can have large health consequences. The process of building knowledge and practice in medicine and public health needs fundamental revision.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Using numerical modelling and simulation to assess the ethical burden in clinical trials and how it relates to the proportion of responders in a trial sample 93%
- Laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infection triggers for acute myocardial infarction and stroke: systematic review protocol 93%
- The Effect of Famotidine on Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 Studies: Discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation 93%
- The devil is in the details: Reporting and transparent research practices in sports medicine and orthopedic clinical trials 93%
- Real-world effects of ACE inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers: protocol for an emulation study of the ONTARGET trial using electronic health records 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- High burden of non-adherence to blood pressure-lowering medications: meta-analysis of data from over 34,000 adults with hypertension in Sub-Saharan Africa 93%
- Association of Cardiologist Clinic Visits with Cardiovascular Primary Prevention Outcomes Among People with HIV from Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Groups in the Southern United States 92%
- Patient Risk-Benefit Preferences for Transcatheter versus Surgical Mitral Valve Repair 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Statistical Analysis Plan for the Stepped-wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Electronic Early Notification of Sepsis in Hospitalized Ward Patients (SCREEN): a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 93%
- Controlled evaLuation of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for COVID-19 respIraTorY disease (CLARITY): Statistical analysis plan for a randomised controlled Bayesian adaptive sample size trial 93%
- Evaluating Diuretics in Normal Care (EVIDENCE): Protocol of a cluster randomised controlled equivalence trial of prescribing policy to compare the effectiveness of thiazide-type diuretics in hypertension. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Learning Decision Thresholds for Risk-Stratification Models from Aggregate Clinician Behavior 92%
- Clinical Utility of Automatable Prediction Models for Improving Palliative and End-Of-Life Care Outcomes: Towards Routine Decision Analysis Before Implementation 91%
- A Web-based Tool for Automatically linking Clinical Trials to their Publications 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.