Back

Distinct serum anti-Aβ antibody patterns in hemorrhagic and inflammatory cerebral amyloid angiopathy manifestations

Chantran, Y.; Capron, J.; Doukhi, D.; Felix, J.; Feroul, M.; Kruse, F.; Chaigneau, T.; Dorothee, G.; Allou, T.; Ayrignac, X.; Barrou, Z.; de Broucker, T.; Cret, C.; Turc, G.; Peres, R.; Wacongne, A.; Sarazin, M.; Renard, D.; Cordonnier, C.; Alamowitch, S.; Aucouturier, P.

2020-10-09 neurology
10.1101/2020.10.07.20208330 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo study blood anti-A{beta} antibodies in the context of spontaneous inflammatory or hemorrhagic CAA manifestations, which are similar to complications occurring after monoclonal anti-A{beta} antibody immunotherapies. MethodsIn this case-control study, serum anti-A{beta} antibody isotype, concentration, avidity, and reactivity toward soluble or fibrillary A{beta}1-40 and A{beta}1-42 isoforms were assessed using an ELISA-based multiplex analysis. Anti-A{beta} serologic patterns were defined in CAA and CAA subgroups using multivariable logistic regression analyses. ResultsFourty-one healthy aged controls and 64 CAA patients were recruited: 46 with hemorrhagic features (CAA-he) and 18 with CAA-related inflammation (CAA-ri). As compared to controls, the most striking features of CAA-related serological profiles were the following: i) both CAA-he and CAA-ri patients displayed lower binding diversity of anti-soluble A{beta}1-40 IgM; ii) CAA-he patients displayed higher anti-soluble A{beta}1-40 / fibrillary A{beta}1-42 IgG4 concentrations ratio and higher anti-soluble A{beta}1-42 IgG4 and IgA avidity; iii) CAA-ri patients displayed higher binding diversity of anti-soluble A{beta}1-40 IgG3 and higher anti-fibrillary/soluble A{beta}1-42 IgG4 dilution curve steepness ratio. ConclusionThis proof-of-concept study revealed anti-A{beta} antibody variations in CAA patients, some of which were associated to CAA clinical phenotypes, unveiling pathophysiological insights regarding CAA-hemorrhagic and inflammatory related events.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.