Back

Benchmarking ensemble docking methods as a scientific outreach project

Gan, J. L.; Kumar, D.; Chen, C.; Taylor, B. C.; Jagger, B. R.; Amaro, R. E.; Lee, C. T.

2020-10-04 scientific communication and education
10.1101/2020.10.02.324343 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The discovery of new drugs is a time consuming and expensive process. Methods such as virtual screening, which can filter out ineffective compounds from drug libraries prior to expensive experimental study, have become popular research topics. As the computational drug discovery community has grown, in order to benchmark the various advances in methodology, organizations such as the Drug Design Data Resource have begun hosting blinded grand challenges seeking to identify the best methods for ligand pose-prediction, ligand affinity ranking, and free energy calculations. Such open challenges offer a unique opportunity for researchers to partner with junior students (e.g., high school and undergraduate) to validate basic yet fundamental hypotheses considered to be uninteresting to domain experts. Here, we, a group of high school-aged students and their mentors, present the results of our participation in Grand Challenge 4 where we predicted ligand affinity rankings for the Cathepsin S protease, an important protein target for autoimmune diseases. To investigate the effect of incorporating receptor dynamics on ligand affinity rankings, we employed the Relaxed Complex Scheme, a molecular docking method paired with molecular dynamics-generated receptor conformations. We found that CatS is a difficult target for molecular docking and we explore some advanced methods such as distance-restrained docking to try to improve the correlation with experiments. This project has exemplified the capabilities of high school students when supported with a rigorous curriculum, and demonstrates the value of community-driven competitions for beginners in computational drug discovery.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.8%
2
Journal of Cheminformatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
3
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.2%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
7
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
8
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
9
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
11
Entropy
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
13
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
14
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.3%
17
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
18
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
20
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Computational Biology and Chemistry
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
25
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
27
Journal of Biosciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
28
Biophysics and Physicobiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%