Back

The role of NIH funding in vaccine readiness; foundational research and NIH funding underlying candidate SARS-CoV-2 vaccines

Kiszewski, A. E.; Galkina Cleary, E. I.; Jackson, M. J.; Ledley, F. D.

2020-09-09 health policy
10.1101/2020.09.08.20187559
Show abstract

This work characterizes the NIH contribution to vaccine technologies being employed in "warp speed" development of vaccines for COVID-19, as well as the lack of sustained NIH funding for published research against recognized epidemic threats. Using quantitative methods, we examined the advance of published research on ten of the vaccine technologies incorporated in the 165 candidate vaccines entering development through July 2020 as well as the NIH funding that supported this research. Live, attenuated virus, inactivated virus, and adjuvant technologies have been used in successful products since the 1950s and continue to exhibit steady advance. Synthetic (recombinant) vaccines, viral vectors, DNA, and TLR9 agonists as adjuvants emerged since the 1980s, and exhibit a logistic, "S-curve" pattern of growth characteristic of emerging technologies that have passed an analytically-defined established point. In contrast, mRNA, virus-like particle, and nanoparticle technologies show exponential growth characteristic of technologies short of their established points. The body of research and NIH funding for established and emerging vaccine technologies exhibited sustained growth through the late 2010s, supported by > 16,000 project years of NIH funding totaling over $17.2 billion (2000-2019), the majority through cooperative agreements and intramural programs. NIH funding for published research on vaccines for recognized zoonotic threats including coronavirus, Zika, Ebola, and dengue, however, has been inconsistent and reactive to disease outbreaks. These data are considered in the context of the high failure rate for candidate vaccines and evidence that technological maturity is a significant factor in the efficiency of product development. Sustained funding for both enabling technologies and vaccine development is essential to ensure a rapid response to COVID and future pandemic threats. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTThis work examines the advance of research and NIH funding for technologies being employed in "warp speed" development of COVID-19 vaccines in the context of evidence that mature technologies have a greater likelihood of generating successful products. We show that candidate vaccines for COVID-19 employ a variety of established and still-emerging technologies, and identify $17.2 billion in NIH funding for this research from 2000-2019. In contrast, NIH funding for published research for vaccines on recognized pandemic threats has been inconsistent. This work highlights the significance and scale of the NIH contribution to vaccine technologies and the lack of sustained initiatives for vaccine development.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
based on 100 papers
Top 0.4%
11.1%
2
Vaccines
based on 131 papers
Top 0.9%
7.5%
3
Nature Medicine
based on 88 papers
Top 0.5%
6.4%
4
Vaccine
based on 140 papers
Top 2%
6.4%
5
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 64%
5.8%
6
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 31%
5.8%
7
PNAS Nexus
based on 22 papers
Top 0.1%
5.0%
8
PLOS Biology
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
Science Translational Medicine
based on 40 papers
Top 1%
2.9%
10
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
based on 23 papers
Top 0.7%
2.8%
11
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 22%
2.8%
12
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 8%
2.4%
13
JAMA
based on 17 papers
Top 0.2%
2.3%
14
F1000Research
based on 28 papers
Top 1.0%
2.3%
15
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 11%
1.8%
16
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 16%
1.8%
17
Nature
based on 58 papers
Top 7%
1.3%
18
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
based on 124 papers
Top 7%
1.3%
19
New England Journal of Medicine
based on 49 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
20
mBio
based on 34 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
21
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
1.2%
22
Cell
based on 28 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
based on 54 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Cell Reports Medicine
based on 49 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Communications Medicine
based on 63 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 22%
0.7%
27
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 20%
0.7%
28
PLOS Medicine
based on 95 papers
Top 18%
0.7%
29
npj Vaccines
based on 18 papers
Top 1%
0.7%