Back

Early Viral Clearance Among COVID-19 Patients When Gargling With Povidone-Iodine And Essential Oils: A Pilot Clinical Trial

MOHAMED, N. A.; BAHAROM, N.; WAN SULAIMAN, W. S.; ZAINOL RASHID, Z.; WONG, K. K.; ALI, U. K.; OTHMAN, S. N.; ABD SAMAD, M. N.; KORI, N.; PERIYASAMY, P.; ZAKARIA, N. A.; SUGUMAR, A. N. K.; MOHAMMAD KAZMIN, N. E.; CHEONG, X. K.; SANIMAN, S. M.; ISAHAK, I.

2020-09-09 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.09.07.20180448 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundGargling had been reported to have significant roles in the prevention and treatment of respiratory tract infections. The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of regular gargling to eliminate SARS-CoV-2 in the oropharynx and nasopharynx. MethodologyThis pilot, open labeled, randomized, parallel study compared the effect of 30 seconds, 3 times/day gargling using 1% povidone-iodine (PVP-I), essential oils and tap water on SARS-CoV-2 viral clearance among COVID-19 patients in a tertiary hospital in Kuala Lumpur. Progress was monitored by day 4,6 and 12 PCR (Ct value), gargling and symptoms diary as well as clinical observations. ResultsFive confirmed Stage 1 COVID-19 patients were recruited for each arm. The age range was from 22 to 56 years old. The majority were males. Two respondents had co-morbidities, which were asthma and obesity. Viral clearance was achieved at day 6 in 100%, 80%, 20% and 0% for 1% PVP-I, essential oils, tap water and control group respectively. Analysis of 1% PVP-I group versus control group showed significant p-value for comparison of PCR results on Day 4, Day 6 and Day 12. ConclusionsThis preliminary study showed that gargling with 1% PVP-I and essential oils show great potential to be part of the treatment and management of Stage 1 COVID-19. Larger studies are required to ascertain the benefit of gargling for different stages of COVID-19 patients. This study was registered in clinicaltrial.gov (NCT04410159).

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.