Rapid evaluation of neutralizing antibodies in COVID-19 patients
Zhang, P.; Li, B.; Min, W.; Wang, X.; Li, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, H.; Jiang, M.; Zheng, H.; Yang, C.; Zhang, W.; Zuo, L.; Gao, Q.; Yang, Z.; Li, Y.; Feng, T.; Lin, C.; Hu, Q.; Song, T.; Yang, R.
Show abstract
The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic calls for a method to rapidly and conveniently evaluate neutralizing antibody (NAb) activity in patients. Here, an up-conversion phosphor technology-based point-of-care testing (UPT-POCT) and a microneutralization assay were employed to detect total antibodies against the receptor-binding domain of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein and NAb activity in COVID-19 patients sera, respectively, in order to determine if UPT-POCT could be used as a surrogate method for rapid evaluation of serum NAb activity in COVID-19 patients. In total, 519 serum samples from 213 recovered and 99 polymerase chain reaction re-positive (RP) COVID-19 patients were used in this report. We found that UPT-POCT reporting values correlated highly with NAb titers from 1:4 to 1:1024, with a correlation coefficient r = 0.9654 (P < 0.001), as well as protection rate against RP (r = 0.9886, P < 0.0001). As a significant point for reducing re-positive rate, UPT-POCT values of 4.380 {+/-} 2.677, corresponding to NAb titer of 1:64, may be appropriate as an indicator for evaluating high efficiency of protection. This study demonstrates that the quantitative lateral flow based UPT-POCT, could be used to rapidly evaluate NAb titer, which is of importance for assessing vaccine immunization efficacy, herd immunity, and screening patient plasma for high NAbs.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of a new automated chemiluminescent anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibody assay system detecting both N and S proteins in Japan 94%
- A High-throughput Microsphere-based Immunoassay of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM Testing for COVID-19 Diagnostics 94%
- Sensitivity evaluation of 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) RT-PCR detection kits and strategy to reduce false negative 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnostic comparison of three fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay platforms for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies 93%
- Comparative evaluation of six immunoassays for the detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 93%
- Performance evaluation of Xpert HBV viral load (VL) assay: Point-of-care molecular test to strengthen and decentralize management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Paper-based Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) Assay for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza 92%
- Development and validation of cost-effective one-step multiplex RT-PCR assay for detecting the SARS-CoV-2 infection using SYBR Green melting curve analysis 92%
- A serological assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in at-home collected finger-prick dried blood spots 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation the auxiliary diagnosis value of antibodies assays for detection of novel coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2) causing an outbreak of pneumonia (COVID-19) 95%
- Suitability of Two Rapid Lateral Flow Immunochromatographic Assays for Predicting SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Activity of Sera 94%
- Analysis Of Four Different Transport And Preservation Medium Kits For SARS-COV-2 Diagnosis From Nasopharyngeal Swab By Real-Time PCR: Adapting To The Constantly Increasing Demand Of Sampling Processing And Stock-Outs During The Pandemic 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.