Back

APOE2 promotes longevity independent of Alzheimer's disease

Shinohara, M.; Kanekiyo, T.; Tachibana, M.; Kurti, A.; Shinohara, M.; Fu, Y.; Zhao, J.; Han, X.; Sullivan, P.; Rebeck, W.; Fryer, J. D.; Heckman, M.; Bu, G.

2020-08-31 neuroscience
10.1101/2020.08.31.255141 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveAlthough apolipoprotein E (APOE) allele associates with longevity, its mechanism is not understood. The protective effects of APOE2 and the deleterious effects of APOE4 on Alzheimers disease (AD) risk may confound APOE effects on longevity. MethodsWe analyzed a large number of subjects from the National Alzheimers Coordinating Center (NACC), and animal models expressing human apoE isoforms in the absence of AD. ResultsClinically, the APOE2 allele was associated with longer lifespan, while APOE4 associated with shorter lifespan, compared to the common APOE3 allele. This effect was also seen irrespective of clinical AD status, and in subjects with little amyloid pathology or after adjustment for AD-related pathologies. In animal studies, apoE2-TR mice also exhibited longer lifespan, while apoE4 showed some trends of shorter lifespan. Notably, old apoE2-TR mice kept activity measured by open field assay, associated with longer lifespan. Evidence of preserved activity in APOE2 carrier was also obtained in clinical records. In animal studies, higher levels of apoE2 in brain and plasma were correlated with activity. Moreover, lower levels of total cholesterol in the brain and higher levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides in the plasma of apoE2-TR mice were associated with apoE levels and more activity. InterpretationAPOE2 can contribute to longevity independent of AD. Preserved activity would be an early-observable feature of apoE2-mediated longevity, where higher levels of apoE2 and its-associated lipid metabolism might be involved.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.