Back

Joint CBC-ICT Interpretation for the pre-surgical screening of COVID 19 asymptomatic cases: A cross-sectional study

Imran, T.; Altaf Naz, H.; Khan, H.; Haider Bangash, A.; Bakhtiar Khan, L.; Khan, H.

2020-07-17 hematology
10.1101/2020.07.16.20138354
Show abstract

BackgroundOn 26th, February 2020, first cases of COVID 19 were confirmed in Pakistan. Since then, surgeries were halted in a bid to prevent transmission. However, since such a long halt is infeasible, a general protocol of screening the carriers, especially asymptomatic carries, is a dire need of time. The objective of our study is to propose an economically feasible protocol of COVID 19 screening. Simple but effective screening strategies can help to restore the workings of hospital surgical departments. MethodsWe analyzed the clinical data of patients turning up for elective surgeries at the Rawal General Hospital (RGH), Islamabad from the 24th of March to the 15th of May, 2020. Asymptomatic patients with negative COVID 19 contact and travel histories were screened with COVID 19 Immunochromatography (ICT) IgM / IgG Ab Test. Complete blood count (CBC) was done and interpreted in conjunction with the ICT results. Results39 patients with a mean age of 49 years were studied. The result of ICT for COVID-19 was positive in 9 cases (23%). The entire positive ICT patients population expressed significantly lower lymphocyte count (p<0.01); 8 patients had high monocyte count (p<0.05) whereas only 4 patients had a combined high neutrophil and monocyte count (P<0.05). All of these four patients with high neutrophil count were females. The combined interpretation of CBC and ICT IgM / IgG Ab Test had a high accuracy in diagnosing asymptomatic COVID-19 carriers that were later confirmed by real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR). ConclusionWe propose that joint CBC-ICT interpretation should be adopted on a large scale to help in the diagnoses of asymptomatic carriers as both tests are simple and inexpensive and thus suit the developing countries limited health budget. Future research projects should be adopted in order to assess the accuracy of the proposed protocol on a large scale.

Matching journals

1
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 21%
18.3%
2
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 99 published papers
Top 0.7%
12× avg
3
Public Health in Practice
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
#1
123× avg
4
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Elsevier BV · based on 115 published papers
Top 0.5%
13× avg
5
British Journal of Haematology
Wiley · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.4%
87× avg
6
Heliyon
Elsevier BV · based on 57 published papers
Top 0.3%
16× avg
7
BMC Public Health
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 148 published papers
Top 3%
7.2× avg
8
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Wiley · based on 15 published papers
#1
62× avg
9
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 14 published papers
#1
87× avg
10
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 50%
3.0%
11
BMC Infectious Diseases
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 110 published papers
Top 4%
5.5× avg
12
Diagnostics
MDPI AG · based on 36 published papers
Top 2%
12× avg
13
Cureus
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 64 published papers
Top 8%
2.9× avg
14
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
BMJ · based on 10 published papers
Top 1%
25× avg
15
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 10 published papers
Top 0.6%
23× avg
16
Vaccines
MDPI AG · based on 131 published papers
Top 4%
4.4× avg
17
Journal of Medical Virology
Wiley · based on 95 published papers
Top 6%
3.8× avg
18
European Journal of Neurology
Wiley · based on 20 published papers
Top 2%
15× avg
19
Emerging Infectious Diseases
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) · based on 84 published papers
Top 10%
2.1× avg