Back

Joint CBC-ICT Interpretation for the pre-surgical screening of COVID 19 asymptomatic cases: A cross-sectional study

Imran, T.; Altaf Naz, H.; Khan, H.; Haider Bangash, A.; Bakhtiar Khan, L.

2020-10-25 hematology
10.1101/2020.07.16.20138354 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundOn 26th, February 2020, first cases of COVID 19 were confirmed in Pakistan. Since then, surgeries were halted in a bid to prevent transmission. However, since such a long halt is infeasible, a general protocol of screening the carriers, especially asymptomatic carries, is a dire need of time. The objective of our study is to propose an economically feasible protocol of COVID 19 screening. Simple but effective screening strategies can help to restore the workings of hospital surgical departments. MethodsWe analyzed the clinical data of patients turning up for elective surgeries at the Rawal General Hospital (RGH), Islamabad from the 24th of March to the 15th of May, 2020. Asymptomatic patients with negative COVID 19 contact and travel histories were screened with COVID 19 Immunochromatography (ICT) IgM / IgG Ab Test. Complete blood count (CBC) was done and interpreted in conjunction with the ICT results. Results39 patients with a mean age of 49 years were studied. The result of ICT for COVID-19 was positive in 9 cases (23%). The entire positive ICT patients population expressed significantly lower lymphocyte count (p<0.01); 8 patients had high monocyte count (p<0.05) whereas only 4 patients had a combined high neutrophil and monocyte count (P<0.05). All of these four patients with high neutrophil count were females. The combined interpretation of CBC and ICT IgM / IgG Ab Test had a high accuracy in diagnosing asymptomatic COVID-19 carriers that were later confirmed by real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR). ConclusionWe propose that joint CBC-ICT interpretation should be adopted on a large scale to help in the diagnoses of asymptomatic carriers as both tests are simple and inexpensive and thus suit the developing countries limited health budget. Future research projects should be adopted in order to assess the accuracy of the proposed protocol on a large scale.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.4%
2
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.1%
3
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.8%
4
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Tropical Medicine & International Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
7
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
8
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
9
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
10
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.9%
12
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
15
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
16
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
17
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
19
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
21
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
23
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
24
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%