Back

A highly expressing, soluble, and stable plant-made IgG fusion carrying Zika virus envelope domain III elicits potent immunogenic responses in mice without adjuvant

Diamos, A. G.; Pardhe, M. D.; Sun, H.; Hunter, J. G.; Kilbourne, J.; Chen, Q.; Mason, H. S.

2020-07-14 immunology
10.1101/2020.07.13.199703 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Therapeutics based on fusing a protein of interest to the IgG Fc domain have been enormously successful, though fewer studies have investigated the vaccine potential of IgG fusions. In this study, we systematically compared the key properties of seven different plant-made human IgG1 fusion vaccine candidates using Zika virus (ZIKV) envelope domain III (ZE3) as a model antigen. Complement protein C1q binding of the IgG fusions was enhanced by: 1) antigen fusion to the IgG N-terminus; 2) removal of the IgG light chain or Fab regions; 3) addition of hexamer-inducing mutations in the IgG Fc; 4) adding a self-binding epitope tag to create recombinant immune complexes (RIC); or 5) producing IgG fusions in plants that lack plant-specific {beta}1,2-linked xylose and 1,3-linked fucose N-linked glycans. We also characterized the expression, solubility, and stability of the IgG fusions. By optimizing immune complex formation, a potently immunogenic vaccine candidate with improved solubility and high stability was produced at 1.5 mg IgG fusion per g leaf fresh weight. In mice, the IgG fusions elicited high titers of Zika-specific antibodies which neutralized ZIKV using only two doses without adjuvant, reaching up to 150-fold higher antibody titers than ZE3 antigen alone. We anticipate these findings will be broadly applicable to the creation of other vaccines and antibody-based therapeutics. Highlights O_LIA modified immune complex has high expression, solubility, stability, and immunogenicity. C_LIO_LIAntigen immunogenicity is improved up to 150-fold by fusion to plant-made IgGs. C_LIO_LIHigh serum IgG titers >1:500,000 were achieved with only two doses without adjuvant. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.