Back

Development and Validation of Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism risk prediction model

Woo, S. H.; Rhoades, R.; Ackermann, L.; Cowan, S. W.; Zavodnick, J.; Marhefka, G. D.

2020-06-23 hematology
10.1101/2020.06.21.20136432 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundVTE is a serious postoperative complication after surgery with resultant higher morbidity and mortality. Despite years of experience with current risk models, rates continue to be high and more information is needed on individual patient risk in the prophylaxis era. Research QuestionsCan we assess the individualized risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) for broad categories of surgery? MethodsThis study was performed using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Database. Patient data (n=2,875,190) from 2015-2017 were used for study analysis. Eight predictors were selected for the model: age, preoperative platelet count[≥]450 (x109/L), disseminated cancer, corticosteroid use, serum albumin [≤]2.5 g/dL, preoperative sepsis, hospital length of stay and surgery type. The second model included 7 predictors without hospital length of stay. A predictive model was trained using ACS-NSQIP data from 2015-2016 (n=1,859,227) and tested using data from 2017 (n= 1,015,963). Primary outcomes are postoperative 30-day VTE, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE). ResultsVTE occurred in 23,249 patients (0.81%) and 49.9% of VTE occurred after discharge from index hospitalization. The risk prediction model had high AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) for postoperative VTE of 0.78 (training cohort) and 0.78 (test cohort). InterpretationThis clinical prediction model is a validated, practical and easy-to-use tool to identify surgical patients at the highest risk of postoperative VTE and provide an individualized assessment of risk based on clinical factors and type of surgery. This prediction model may be used as a tool to assess individualized risk of postoperative VTE and promote broader discussion and awareness of the VTE risk during the perioperative period.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 9%
19.0%
2
Clinical Epidemiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
9.9%
4
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
5
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.3%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.4%
8
BMJ
51 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
9
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.3%
10
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.5%
12
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
13
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.0%
14
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
15
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
16
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
18
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
Physiological Reports
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
22
Journal of Medical Virology
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.6%