Cohen's kappa statistics as a convenient means to identify accurate SARS-CoV-2 rapid antibody tests
Iseki, H.
Show abstract
There are many available rapid antibody tests, but the performance of such tests remains unclear. Moreover, it is difficult to compare among the various devices regarding their sensitivity & specificity. In order to compare the performance of such devices, we used Cohen kappa statistics to assess the level of agreement between RT-PCR and rapid antibody tests. In doing this study, we considered the term of validity after symptom-onset to compare two tests. It takes more than a week to produce antibodies in the body, and RT-PCR thus gives negative result in the convalescent period. On ELISA data from the literature kappa statistics was calculated as 1.0 beyond 10 days after symptom-onset. By taking these factors into consideration, we evaluated agreement with samples collected beyond 10 days of symptom-onset during the active period. We calculated the data from 9 devices, and the kappa statistics for English data were calculated as 0.64 on average. The same finding was 0.75 for Chinese data. These results corresponded with the values from sensitivity & specificity of their reports. Both reports had no details about the collection procedures. Kappa statistics might become even more accurate, if samples could be restricted to ones collected beyond 10 days. Regarding the data from our hospital, the kappa statistics was 0.97 when restricted to samples collected beyond 10 days, which thus showed excellent agreement. By using kappa statistics, the performances of rapid antibody tests can be shown as one figure, so that their comparison becomes easy to carry out. Highlights{blacksquare} Using kappa statistics, agreement between PCR and ELISA was perfect from the data beyond 10 days of symptom-onset. {blacksquare}The results of kappa statistics corresponded with the values from sensitivity & specificity of the English and the Chinese literatures. {blacksquare}Kappa statistics was calculated as 0.97 from the data beyond 10 days of symptom-onset, and sensitivity & specificity were 95.2% and 100% in our hospital. {blacksquare}Kappa statistics is a convenient means to identify accurate rapid antibody tests.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating diagnostic accuracies of Panbio ™ COVID-19 rapid antigen test and RT-PCR for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia using Bayesian Latent-Class Models (BLCM) 94%
- Development and Evaluation of Two Rapid Indigenous IgG-ELISA immobilized with ACE-2 Binding Peptides for Detection Neutralizing Antibodies Against SARS-CoV-2 94%
- Validation of a new automated chemiluminescent anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibody assay system detecting both N and S proteins in Japan 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of seven different rapid methods for nucleic acid detection of SARS-COV-2 virus 95%
- Evaluation of rapid antibody test and chest computed tomography results of COVID-19 patients: A retrospective study 94%
- Probable causes and risk factors for positive SARS-CoV-2 test in recovered patients: Evidence from Brunei Darussalam 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2 testing in the Slovak Republic from March 2020 to September 2022 – summary of the pandemic trends 94%
- Is the infection of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant associated with the outcomes of COVID-19 patients? 93%
- Clinical findings in critical ill patients infected with SARS-Cov-2 in Guangdong Province, China: a multi-center, retrospective, observational study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Antibody response in individuals affected with Sars-Cov-2 infection: temporal trends and qualitative and quantitative differences in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects. A Cross Sectional Analysis. Ab-Covid Study 91%
- Online Queries As A Criterion For Evaluation Of The Epidemiological Status And Effectiveness Of COVID-19 Epidemic Control Measures 91%
- Epidemiology of COVID-19 and effect of public health interventions, Chennai, India, March - October 2020 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.