Back

Amount of fiction reading correlates with higher connectivity between cortical areas for language and mentalizing

Hartung, F.; Willems, R. M.

2020-06-09 scientific communication and education
10.1101/2020.06.08.139923 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Behavioral evidence suggests that engaging with fiction is positively correlated with social abilities. The rationale behind this link is that engaging with fiction and fictional characters may offer a training mode for mentalizing and empathizing with sentient agents in the real world, analogous to a flight simulator for pilots. In this study, we explored the relationship between reading fiction and mentalizing by looking at brain network dynamics in 57 participants who varied on how much fiction they read in their daily lives. The hypothesis was that if reading fiction indeed trains mentalizing, a task that requires mentalizing -Like immersing in a fictional story and engaging with a protagonist-should elicit differences in brain network dynamics depending on how much people read. More specifically, more frequent readers should show increased connectivity within the theory of mind network (ToM) or between the ToM network and other brain networks. While brain activation was measured with fMRI, participants listened to two literary narratives. We computed time-course correlations between brain regions and compared the correlation values from listening to narratives to listening to an auditory baseline condition. The between-region correlations were then related to individual differences measures including the amount of fiction that participants consume in their daily lives. Our results show that there is a linear relationship between how much people read and the functional connectivity in areas known to be involved in language and mentalizing. This adds neurobiological credibility to the fiction influences mentalizing abilities hypothesis as suggested on the basis of conceptual analysis.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
2
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.5%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.5%
5
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.3%
6
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
8
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
Cognitive Neurodynamics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
10
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
11
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
12
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
14
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
15
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
16
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.5%
18
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
19
Entropy
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
23
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Brain Connectivity
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
26
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
27
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%