Back

Establishing the construct validity and Internal consistency for Urdu version of Jefferson Scale of Empathy-S (JSE-S)

Muhammad, S. R.

2020-06-09 medical education
10.1101/2020.06.07.20114173 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVESEmpathy is an important factor in patient-physician relationship that results in better patient compliance, satisfaction, and clinical outcomes. Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE) assesses empathy in health professionals (HP-version) and related students (S-version). It has been translated in over 50 languages and validation studies have been performed on these translated S-version of the scale. We decided to examine empathy of Pakistani student and to study factor structure and psychometric properties of the Urdu translation of the JSE-S. METHODS405 out of 521 students of Muhammad Medical College participated in the study. It was a cross-sectional study and the students filled in Urdu version of JSE-S questionnaire consisting of 20 items. Each item was scored on 7-points Likert scale. Total scores ranged from 20 to 140. Higher values indicated more positive attitudes toward empathic patient care, and therefore a higher degree of empathy RESULTSThe mean JSE-S empathy score of the medical students was 107.22 (+/- 12.844). Cronbachs alpha coefficient was 0.684 for the overall measure. Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test yielded an index of 0.764, suggesting a support for factor analysis. Bartletts test of sphericity was 985.518 and was highly significant (P = 000). A principal component analysis showed a three-factor solution that also provided support for the construct validity of the Urdu version of JSE S-version. CONCLUSIONThe Urdu version of JSE is a valid and reliable measure to tap empathy in a Pakistani medical student.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.