Back

Analysis of socioeconomic disadvantage and pace of aging measured in saliva DNA methylation of children and adolescents

Raffington, L. A. S.; Belsky, D. W.; Malanchini, M.; Tucker-Drob, E. M.; Harden, K. P.

2020-06-05 developmental biology
10.1101/2020.06.04.134502 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Children who grow up in socioeconomically disadvantaged families face increased burden of disease and disability as they mature into adulthood. One hypothesized mechanism for this increased burden is that early-life disadvantage and its associated psychological stress accelerate biological processes of aging, increasing vulnerability to subsequent disease. In order to evaluate this hypothesis and the potential impact of preventive interventions, measures to quantify the early acceleration of biological aging in childhood are needed. Here, we evaluated a novel DNA-methylation measure of the pace of aging, DunedinPoAm, and compared DunedinPoAm results with results for several published epigenetic clocks. Data on saliva DNA-methylation and socioeconomic circumstances were collected from N = 600 children and adolescents aged 8- to 18-years-old (48% female) participating in the Texas Twin Project. Participants living in more disadvantaged families and neighborhoods exhibited faster pace of aging (r = 0.18, p = 0.001 for both). Latinx-identifying children exhibited faster DunedinPoAm compared to both White- and Latinx-White-identifying children, consistent with higher levels of disadvantage in this group. Children with more advanced pubertal development and those with had higher body-mass index also exhibited faster DunedinPoAm, but these covariates did not account for the observed socioeconomic gradient in methylation pace of aging. In contrast to findings for DunedinPoAm, we did not detect associations of socioeconomic disadvantage with five published epigenetic clocks. Findings suggest that DNA-methylation pace-of-aging measures may prove more sensitive to health damaging effects of adversity, particularly when measurements are taken early in the life course, before substantial aging has occurred.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.