Prognostic value of visual quantification of lesion severity at initial chest CT in confirmed Covid-19 infection: a retrospective analysis on 216 patients
Taieb, E.; Labani, A.; Ruch, Y.; Danion, F.; Oberlin, M.; Bilbault, P.; Leyendecker, P.; Roy, C.; Ohana, M.
Show abstract
Rationale and ObjectivesStudies suggest an association between chest CT findings assessed with semi-quantitative CT score and gravity of Covid-19. The objective of this work is to analyze potential correlation between visual quantification of lesion severity at initial chest CT and clinical outcome in confirmed Covid-19 patients. Materials and MethodsFrom March 5th to March 21st, 2020, all consecutive patients that underwent chest CT for clinical suspicion of Covid-19 at a single tertiary center were retrospectively evaluated for inclusion. Patients with lung parenchyma lesions compatible with Covid-19 and positive RT-PCR were included. Global extensiveness of abnormal lung parenchyma was visually estimated and classified independently by 2 readers, following the European Society of Thoracic Imaging Guidelines. Death and/or mechanical ventilation within 30 days following the initial chest CT was chosen as the primary hard endpoint. Results216 patients (124 men, 62 years-old {+/-} 16.5, range 22 - 94 yo) corresponding to 216 chest CT were included. Correlation between lesion severity and percentage of patients that met the primary endpoint was high, with a coefficient {rho} of 0.87 (p = 0.05). A greater than 25% involvement was significantly associated with a higher risk of mechanical ventilation or death at 30 days, with a Risk Ratio of 5.00 (95% CI [3.59-6.99]). ConclusionThis retrospective cohort confirms a correlation between visual evaluation of lesions severity at initial chest CT and the 30 days clinical outcome of Covid-19 patients and suggests using a threshold of greater than 25% involvement to identify patients at risk.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantitative analysis of chest computed tomography of COVID-19 pneumonia using a software widely used in Japan 95%
- Organizing Pneumonia of COVID-19: Time-dependent Evolution and Outcome in CT Findings 94%
- Multi-modal data to identify key factors influencing lung injury in ARDS patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation: A prospective observational study protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated airway quantification associates with mortality in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis 95%
- Observer agreement and clinical significance of chest CT reporting in patients suspected of COVID-19 95%
- Predicting EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma presenting as ground-glass opacity: utilizing radiomics model in clinical translation 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The incremental value of computed tomography of COVID-19 pneumonia in predicting ICU admission 93%
- Immune, metabolic, anatomical, and functional features of people after successful tuberculosis treatment: an exploratory analysis 92%
- High-Dimensional Multinomial Multiclass Severity Scoring of COVID-19 Pneumonia Using CT Radiomics Features and Machine Learning Algorithms 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Passive Microwave Radiometry (MWR) for diagnostics of COVID-19 lung complications in Kyrgyzstan 93%
- Volumetric lung cancer screening reduces unnecessary low-dose computed tomography scans: results from a single-centre prospective trial on 4,119 subjects 92%
- Auto-detection of motion artifacts on CT pulmonary angiograms with a physician-trained AI algorithm 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Intensive care risk estimation in COVID-19 pneumonia based on clinical and imaging parameters: experiences from the Munich cohort 92%
- Screening for Right Ventricular Dysfunction in the Emergency Department Using a Smartphone ECG Analysis Application: An External Validation Study with Acute Pulmonary Embolism Patients 90%
- Artificial Intelligence in laryngeal endoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.