A rapid urban biodiversity blitz using aquatic environmental DNA
Hupalo, K.; Majaneva, M.; Czachur, M. V.; Sire, L.; Marquina, D.; Lijtmaer, D. A.; Ivanov, V.; Leidenberger, S.; Ciampor, F.; Ciamporova-Zatovicova, Z.; Mendes, I. S.; Desiderato, A.; Topstad, L.; Meganck, K.; Hariz Z. A., D.; Kjaerstad, G.; Lin, X.-L.; Price, B.; Stevens, M.; Ekrem, T.; Deiner, K.
Show abstract
Background As global biodiversity declines, there’s an increasing need to create an educated and engaged society. Having people from all ages participate in measuring biodiversity where they live helps to create awareness. Recently, the use of environmental DNA (eDNA) for biodiversity surveys has gained momentum. Here, we test whether sampling eDNA and metabarcoding can be used for rapid urban biodiversity surveys for educational purposes.Materials & Methods We sampled 2×1 L of water from each of 15 locations in the city of Trondheim, Norway, including a variety of freshwater, marine and brackish habitats. DNA was extracted, amplified in triplicate for the COI gene and sequenced. The obtained data were analysed on the novel mBRAVE platform, an online open access software and computing resource.Results The water samples were collected in two days by two people and the lab analysis was completed in five days by one person. Overall, we detected the presence of 501 taxa identified as belonging to 435 species, representing 90 orders and 18 phyla. On average, only 5.4% of the taxa were shared among six replicates per site. Based on the observed diversity, three distinct clusters were detected and related to geographic distribution of sites. There were some taxa shared between the habitats, with a substantial presence of terrestrial biota.Discussion Our results match expected patterns of biodiversity in the landscape and show that with minimal sampling effort, hundreds of species can be detected. Thus, using eDNA analysis of water is promising for rapid biodiversity surveys, and it is likely that more detailed results could be obtained by optimising field and lab methods for particular groups of interest. We recommend that rapid eDNA surveys, with openly available services and softwares, can be used to raise awareness in the importance of biodiversity.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.View Full Text
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Considerations for metabarcoding-based port biological baseline surveys aimed at marine non-indigenous species monitoring and risk-assessments 97%
- A Multi-Taxa Approach to Estuarine Biomonitoring: Assessing Vertebrate Biodiversity and Ecological Continuity using Environmental DNA Metabarcoding in the Rance River (Brittany, France) 96%
- Sampling The Zebrafish Gut Microbiota - A Genome Resolved Metagenomic Approach 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Metabarcoding unsorted kick-samples facilitates macroinvertebrate-based biomonitoring with increased taxonomic resolution, while outperforming environmental DNA 97%
- eDNA in a bottleneck: obstacles to fish metabarcoding studies in megadiverse freshwater systems 97%
- BirT: a novel primer pair for avian environmental DNA metabarcoding 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Haplotype-level metabarcoding of freshwater macroinvertebrate species: a prospective tool for population genetic analysis 96%
- Environmental DNA as a complementary tool for biodiversity monitoring: A multi-technique and multi-trophic approach to investigate cetacean distribution and feeding ecology 95%
- Evaluation of nanopore sequencing for increasing accessibility of eDNA studies in biodiverse countries 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing DNA metabarcoding performance and applicability with bait capture enrichment and DNA from conservative ethanol 97%
- Enhancing metabarcoding efficiency and ecological insights through integrated taxonomy and DNA reference barcoding: a case study on beach meiofauna 96%
- Assessing the utility of marine filter feeders for environmental DNA (eDNA) biodiversity monitoring 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Beyond fish eDNA metabarcoding: Field replicates disproportionately improve the detection of stream associated vertebrate species 97%
- Can metabarcoding resolve intraspecific genetic diversity changes to environmental stressors? A test case using river macrozoobenthos 97%
- Read counts from environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding reflect fish abundance and biomass in drained ponds 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.