Back

Pharmacokinetics of anti-tuberculosis drugs in multidrug resistant tuberculosis patients in India

AK, H. K.; PL, N.; T, K.; R, S.; S, K.; V, V. k.; NS, G.; T, B.; V, S.; S, B.; S, R. K.; Nair, D.; SP, T.; R, G.

2020-05-27 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.1101/2020.05.26.20111534 medRxiv
Show abstract

Programmatic Management of multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB) services were introduced in the Indian TB control programme in 2007. A pharmacokinetic (PK) study of drugs used to treat MDR TB, namely levofloxacin (LFX), ethionamide (ETH), cycloserine (CS), pyrazinamide (PZA), moxifloxacin (MFX) and isoniazid (INH) was undertaken in adult MDR TB patients treated according to the prevailing guidelines in India. Factors influencing drug PK and end-of-intensive phase (IP) status were also determined. We recruited 350 MDR TB patients receiving anti-TB treatment (ATT) in the Indian Government programme in south India. At steady state, serial blood samples were collected, after supervised drug administration. Status at end of IP was noted from the programme records. Of the 303 patients for whom end-of-IP status was known, 214 were culture negative (responders), while 45 patients were either culture positive or required change of regimen or had died before completion of IP (non-responders). The median Cmax (2.0 vs 2.9g/ml; p = 0.005) and AUC0-12 (12.2 vs 17.0g/ml.h; p = 0.002) of ETH were significantly lower in non-responders than responders at IP. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, after excluding defaulters and adjusting for confounders, AUC0-12 of ETH significantly influenced end-of-IP status (aOR - 1.065; 95% CI: 1.001 - 1.134; p = 0.047). Drug doses used currently in the programme produced optimal drug concentrations in majority of patients. ETH played a major role in the MDR TB combination regimen and was a key determinant of end-of-IP status.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.5%
2
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.7%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
4
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.5%
6
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.4%
7
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.1%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.9%
9
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.8%
10
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
11
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
13
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
16
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
18
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
20
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
22
Tuberculosis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
23
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.5%
24
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
25
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
26
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%