Back

The changes in the p53 protein across the animal kingdom pointing to its involvement in longevity

Brazda, V.; Bartas, M.; Volna, A.; Cerven, J.; Pecinka, P.; Zawacka-Pankau, J.

2020-06-06 bioinformatics
10.1101/2020.05.06.080200 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Recently, the quest for the mythical fountain of youth has turned into extensive research programs aiming to extend the healthy lifespan in humans. Despite advances in our understanding of the aging process, the surprisingly extended lifespan and cancer resistance of some animal species remains unexplained. The p53 protein plays a crucial role in tumor suppression and in tissue homeostasis and aging. Long-lived, cancer-free African elephants, have 20 copies of TP53 gene including 19 retrogenes (38 alleles) which are partially active, whereas humans possess only one copy of TP53 and have an estimated cancer mortality of 11-25%. The mechanism through which p53 contributes to the resolution of the Petos paradox in the Animalia remains vague. Thus, in this work, we took advantage of the available datasets and inspected the p53 amino acid sequence of phylogenetically related organisms that show variations in the lifespan. We discovered new correlations between specific amino acid deviations in p53 and the lifespans across different animal species. We found that species with extended lifespan have certain characteristic amino acid substitutions in the p53 DNA binding domain that alter its function as depicted from the Phenotypic Annotation of p53 Mutations, using PROVEAN tool or SWISS-MODEL workflow. Our findings show a direct association between specific amino acid residues in p53 protein, changes in p53 functionality and the extended animal lifespan, and further highlight the importance of p53 protein in aging.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.